Product Robustness Philosophy - A Strategy Towards Zero Variation Manufacturing (ZVM)

Murthy S. Boorla*, Tobias Eifler, Chris McMahon, Thomas J. Howard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

224 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A product is referred to as robust when its performance is consistent. In current product robustness paradigms, robustness is the responsibility of engineering design. Drawings and 3D models should be released to manufacturing after applying all the possible robust design principles. But there are no methods referred for manufacturing to carry and improve product robustness after the design freeze. This paper proposes a process of inducing product robustness at all stages of product development from design release to the start of mass production. A manufacturing strategy of absorbing all obvious variations and an approach of turning variations to cancel one another are defined. Verified the application feasibility and established the robustness quantification method at each stage. The theoretical and actual sensitivity of different parameters is identified as indicators. Theoretical and actual performance variation and accuracy of estimation are established as robustness metric. Manufacturing plan alignment to design, complimenting the design and process sensitivities, countering process mean shifts with tool deviations, higher adjustable assembly tools are enablers to achieve product robustness.
Original languageEnglish
JournalManagement and Production Engineering Review
Volume9
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)3-12
ISSN2080-8208
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Product robustness
  • Variation absorption
  • Product maturation
  • Zero variation manufacturing
  • Industry 4.0
  • Production readiness

Cite this

@article{9c72d23a695d4d9bbcdfb063762518eb,
title = "Product Robustness Philosophy - A Strategy Towards Zero Variation Manufacturing (ZVM)",
abstract = "A product is referred to as robust when its performance is consistent. In current product robustness paradigms, robustness is the responsibility of engineering design. Drawings and 3D models should be released to manufacturing after applying all the possible robust design principles. But there are no methods referred for manufacturing to carry and improve product robustness after the design freeze. This paper proposes a process of inducing product robustness at all stages of product development from design release to the start of mass production. A manufacturing strategy of absorbing all obvious variations and an approach of turning variations to cancel one another are defined. Verified the application feasibility and established the robustness quantification method at each stage. The theoretical and actual sensitivity of different parameters is identified as indicators. Theoretical and actual performance variation and accuracy of estimation are established as robustness metric. Manufacturing plan alignment to design, complimenting the design and process sensitivities, countering process mean shifts with tool deviations, higher adjustable assembly tools are enablers to achieve product robustness.",
keywords = "Product robustness, Variation absorption, Product maturation, Zero variation manufacturing, Industry 4.0, Production readiness",
author = "Boorla, {Murthy S.} and Tobias Eifler and Chris McMahon and Howard, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.24425/119520",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "3--12",
journal = "Management and Production Engineering Review",
issn = "2080-8208",
publisher = "De Gruyter",
number = "2",

}

Product Robustness Philosophy - A Strategy Towards Zero Variation Manufacturing (ZVM). / Boorla, Murthy S.; Eifler, Tobias; McMahon, Chris; Howard, Thomas J.

In: Management and Production Engineering Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2018, p. 3-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Product Robustness Philosophy - A Strategy Towards Zero Variation Manufacturing (ZVM)

AU - Boorla, Murthy S.

AU - Eifler, Tobias

AU - McMahon, Chris

AU - Howard, Thomas J.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - A product is referred to as robust when its performance is consistent. In current product robustness paradigms, robustness is the responsibility of engineering design. Drawings and 3D models should be released to manufacturing after applying all the possible robust design principles. But there are no methods referred for manufacturing to carry and improve product robustness after the design freeze. This paper proposes a process of inducing product robustness at all stages of product development from design release to the start of mass production. A manufacturing strategy of absorbing all obvious variations and an approach of turning variations to cancel one another are defined. Verified the application feasibility and established the robustness quantification method at each stage. The theoretical and actual sensitivity of different parameters is identified as indicators. Theoretical and actual performance variation and accuracy of estimation are established as robustness metric. Manufacturing plan alignment to design, complimenting the design and process sensitivities, countering process mean shifts with tool deviations, higher adjustable assembly tools are enablers to achieve product robustness.

AB - A product is referred to as robust when its performance is consistent. In current product robustness paradigms, robustness is the responsibility of engineering design. Drawings and 3D models should be released to manufacturing after applying all the possible robust design principles. But there are no methods referred for manufacturing to carry and improve product robustness after the design freeze. This paper proposes a process of inducing product robustness at all stages of product development from design release to the start of mass production. A manufacturing strategy of absorbing all obvious variations and an approach of turning variations to cancel one another are defined. Verified the application feasibility and established the robustness quantification method at each stage. The theoretical and actual sensitivity of different parameters is identified as indicators. Theoretical and actual performance variation and accuracy of estimation are established as robustness metric. Manufacturing plan alignment to design, complimenting the design and process sensitivities, countering process mean shifts with tool deviations, higher adjustable assembly tools are enablers to achieve product robustness.

KW - Product robustness

KW - Variation absorption

KW - Product maturation

KW - Zero variation manufacturing

KW - Industry 4.0

KW - Production readiness

U2 - 10.24425/119520

DO - 10.24425/119520

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 3

EP - 12

JO - Management and Production Engineering Review

JF - Management and Production Engineering Review

SN - 2080-8208

IS - 2

ER -