TY - JOUR
T1 - Power generation from chemically cleaned coals: do environmental benefits of firing cleaner coal outweigh environmental burden of cleaning?
AU - Ryberg, Morten W.
AU - Owsianiak, Mikolaj
AU - Laurent, Alexis
AU - Hauschild, Michael Zwicky
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Power generation from high-ash coals is a niche technology for power generation, but coal cleaning is
deemed necessary to avoid problems associated with low combustion efficiencies and to minimize
environmental burdens associated with emissions of pollutants originating from ash. Here, chemical
beneficiation of coals using acid and alkali–acid leaching procedures is evaluated as a potential coal cleaning
technology employing life cycle assessment (LCA). Taking into account the environmental benefits from firing
cleaner coal in pulverized coal power plants and the environmental burden of the cleaning itself, it is demonstrated
that for a wide range of cleaning procedures and types of coal, chemical cleaning generally performs
worse than combustion of the raw coals and physical cleaning using dense medium separation. These findings
apply for many relevant impact categories, including climate change. Chemical cleaning can be optimized with
regard to electricity, heat and methanol use for the hydrothermal washing step, and could have environmental
impact comparable to that of physical cleaning if the overall resource intensiveness of chemical cleaning is
reduced by a factor 5 to 10, depending on the impact category. The largest potential of the technology is
observed for high-ash lignites, with initial ash content above 30%, for which the environmental benefits from
firing cleaner coal can outweigh the environmental burden of cleaning for some impact categories. Overall, we
recommend to policy makers that coal cleaning using acid or alkali–acid leaching procedures should not be
considered for direct implementation as a coal beneficiation technology. We encourage further research on
chemical cleaning and its optimization, however, as chemical cleaning has advantages that might make it
attractive for cleaning of difficult to treat coals when compared to the less efficient option of physical cleaning.
AB - Power generation from high-ash coals is a niche technology for power generation, but coal cleaning is
deemed necessary to avoid problems associated with low combustion efficiencies and to minimize
environmental burdens associated with emissions of pollutants originating from ash. Here, chemical
beneficiation of coals using acid and alkali–acid leaching procedures is evaluated as a potential coal cleaning
technology employing life cycle assessment (LCA). Taking into account the environmental benefits from firing
cleaner coal in pulverized coal power plants and the environmental burden of the cleaning itself, it is demonstrated
that for a wide range of cleaning procedures and types of coal, chemical cleaning generally performs
worse than combustion of the raw coals and physical cleaning using dense medium separation. These findings
apply for many relevant impact categories, including climate change. Chemical cleaning can be optimized with
regard to electricity, heat and methanol use for the hydrothermal washing step, and could have environmental
impact comparable to that of physical cleaning if the overall resource intensiveness of chemical cleaning is
reduced by a factor 5 to 10, depending on the impact category. The largest potential of the technology is
observed for high-ash lignites, with initial ash content above 30%, for which the environmental benefits from
firing cleaner coal can outweigh the environmental burden of cleaning for some impact categories. Overall, we
recommend to policy makers that coal cleaning using acid or alkali–acid leaching procedures should not be
considered for direct implementation as a coal beneficiation technology. We encourage further research on
chemical cleaning and its optimization, however, as chemical cleaning has advantages that might make it
attractive for cleaning of difficult to treat coals when compared to the less efficient option of physical cleaning.
U2 - 10.1039/c5ee01799h
DO - 10.1039/c5ee01799h
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1754-5692
VL - 8
SP - 2435
EP - 2447
JO - Energy & Environmental Science
JF - Energy & Environmental Science
ER -