Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer

  • The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group
  • BC Cancer - Vancouver
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • NSABP Foundation, Inc.
  • United States Food and Drug Administration
  • University of Antwerp
  • Ghent University
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • University of Melbourne
  • New York University
  • Cornell University
  • University of Milan
  • University of British Columbia
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH
  • German Breast Group
  • Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Harvard University
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Institute of Cancer Research
  • Vivactiv Ltd
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Sjællands Universitetshospital
  • Universidad de la Frontera
  • Forbius
  • KU Leuven
  • PathAI inc.
  • GZA-ZNA Hospitals
  • Lund University
  • Fudan University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

284 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are important prognostic and predictive biomarkers in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer. Incorporating sTILs into clinical practice necessitates reproducible assessment. Previously developed standardized scoring guidelines have been widely embraced by the clinical and research communities. We evaluated sources of variability in sTIL assessment by pathologists in three previous sTIL ring studies. We identify common challenges and evaluate impact of discrepancies on outcome estimates in early TNBC using a newly-developed prognostic tool. Discordant sTIL assessment is driven by heterogeneity in lymphocyte distribution. Additional factors include: technical slide-related issues; scoring outside the tumor boundary; tumors with minimal assessable stroma; including lymphocytes associated with other structures; and including other inflammatory cells. Small variations in sTIL assessment modestly alter risk estimation in early TNBC but have the potential to affect treatment selection if cutpoints are employed. Scoring and averaging multiple areas, as well as use of reference images, improve consistency of sTIL evaluation. Moreover, to assist in avoiding the pitfalls identified in this analysis, we developed an educational resource available at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org/pitfalls.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17
Journalnpj Breast Cancer
Volume6
Issue number1
ISSN2374-4677
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this