Pitfalls in Acoustic Transducer Modeling for Focused Ultrasound (FUS)

Cristina Pasquinelli; Hazael Montanaro; Esra Neufeld; Redi Poni; Niels Kuster; Axel Thielscher

Pitfalls in Acoustic Transducer Modeling for Focused Ultrasound (FUS)

Cristina Pasquinelli
, Hazael Montanaro
, Esra Neufeld
, Redi Poni
, Niels Kuster
, Axel Thielscher

Research output: Contribution to conference › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review

92 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

When modeling therapeutic applications of FUS, the transducer is typically modelled by modeling the transducer surface geometry and imposing a pressure or velocity boundary condition (depending on the solver type). However, during experimental validation of transcranial FUS modeling, dramatic deviations between simulated and measured pressure distributions were observed that were shown to originate from transducer modeling.

Original language	English
Publication date	2018
Number of pages	1
Publication status	Published - 2018
Event	32nd Annual Meeting of the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology - , Germany Duration: 16 May 2018 → 19 May 2018 Conference number: 32 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00066-018-1295-1

Conference

Conference	32nd Annual Meeting of the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology
Number	32
Country/Territory	Germany
Period	16/05/2018 → 19/05/2018
Internet address	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00066-018-1295-1

Access to Document

ESHO18 abstract submissionFinal published version, 599 KB

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@conference{f9d955238b174aff815c8acb943f0095,

title = "Pitfalls in Acoustic Transducer Modeling for Focused Ultrasound (FUS)",

abstract = "When modeling therapeutic applications of FUS, the transducer is typically modelled by modeling the transducer surface geometry and imposing a pressure or velocity boundary condition (depending on the solver type). However, during experimental validation of transcranial FUS modeling, dramatic deviations between simulated and measured pressure distributions were observed that were shown to originate from transducer modeling.",

author = "Cristina Pasquinelli and Hazael Montanaro and Esra Neufeld and Redi Poni and Niels Kuster and Axel Thielscher",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

note = "32nd Annual Meeting of the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, ESHO 2018 ; Conference date: 16-05-2018 Through 19-05-2018",

url = "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00066-018-1295-1",

}

TY - ABST

T1 - Pitfalls in Acoustic Transducer Modeling for Focused Ultrasound (FUS)

AU - Pasquinelli, Cristina

AU - Montanaro, Hazael

AU - Neufeld, Esra

AU - Poni, Redi

AU - Kuster, Niels

AU - Thielscher, Axel

N1 - Conference code: 32

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - When modeling therapeutic applications of FUS, the transducer is typically modelled by modeling the transducer surface geometry and imposing a pressure or velocity boundary condition (depending on the solver type). However, during experimental validation of transcranial FUS modeling, dramatic deviations between simulated and measured pressure distributions were observed that were shown to originate from transducer modeling.

AB - When modeling therapeutic applications of FUS, the transducer is typically modelled by modeling the transducer surface geometry and imposing a pressure or velocity boundary condition (depending on the solver type). However, during experimental validation of transcranial FUS modeling, dramatic deviations between simulated and measured pressure distributions were observed that were shown to originate from transducer modeling.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

T2 - 32nd Annual Meeting of the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology

Y2 - 16 May 2018 through 19 May 2018

ER -

Pitfalls in Acoustic Transducer Modeling for Focused Ultrasound (FUS)

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this