Performance similarities between standard and retrofit LiDAR-assisted control for wind turbines

LiDAR-assisted control has proven to be a highly effective method for mitigating rotor speed deviations and reducing loads in wind turbines. This effectiveness stems from the ability of feedforward controllers to utilize incoming wind speed information obtained from LiDARs, enabling advanced blade pitch actions before the wind disturbs the turbine. However, the standard implementation of LiDAR-assisted control often necessitates modifications to the existing feedback controller, where the feedforward pitch rate is typically integrated into the feedback controller. This process can be challenging in terms of accessibility and may be limited to specific stakeholders, such as turbine manufacturers.
A retrofit design provides an ideal solution, where the retrofit LiDAR-assisted controller modifies the rotor speed measurement to induce pitch actions without requiring alterations to the existing feedback controller. This paper aims to demonstrate the performance similarities between the standard LiDAR-assisted controller and its retrofit counterpart. Specifically, we establish that the retrofit LiDAR-assisted controller, with appropriate tuning, is equivalent to its standard counterpart. This equivalence implies that architecturally dissimilar controllers can yield the same performance in terms of rotor speed deviations and tower load reductions. The presented findings are supported by results obtained from high-fidelity closed-loop turbine simulations.