TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of municipal waste stabilization ponds in the Canadian Arctic.
AU - Ragush, Colin M.
AU - Schmidt, Jordan J.
AU - Krkosek, Wendy H.
AU - Gagnon, Graham A.
AU - Hansen, Lisbeth Truelstrup
AU - Jamieson, Rob C.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The majority of small remote communities in the Canadian arctic territory of Nunavut utilize waste stabilization
ponds (WSPs) for municipal wastewater treatment because of their relatively low capital and
operational costs, and minimal complexity. New national effluent quality regulations have been implemented
in Canada, but not yet applied to Canada’s Arctic due to uncertainty related to the performance
of current wastewater treatment systems. Waste stabilization pond (WSP) treatment performance is
impacted by community water use, pond design, and climate. The greatest challenge arctic communities
experience when using passive wastewater treatment technologies is the constraints imposed by the
extreme climate, which is characterized as having long cold winters with short cool summers that can be
solar intense. The removal of carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD5), total suspended solids
(TSS), and ammonia-nitrogen were measured during the summer treatment period (late June until early
September) from 2011 to 2014 in the WSP systems of four Nunavut communities; Pond Inlet, Clyde River,
Grise Fiord and Kugaaruk. Monitoring results showed that WSPs in their current single cell design can
achieve greater than 80% removal of CBOD5 and TSS but were challenged to produce effluent quality that
meets secondary wastewater treatment standards (<25 mg/l CBOD5 and TSS). This study points to the
need for revisions of design guidelines for facultative WSPs in the Arctic, as current systems are anaerobic
and do not contain sufficient dissolved oxygen required to consistently support aerobic biological
treatment processes.
AB - The majority of small remote communities in the Canadian arctic territory of Nunavut utilize waste stabilization
ponds (WSPs) for municipal wastewater treatment because of their relatively low capital and
operational costs, and minimal complexity. New national effluent quality regulations have been implemented
in Canada, but not yet applied to Canada’s Arctic due to uncertainty related to the performance
of current wastewater treatment systems. Waste stabilization pond (WSP) treatment performance is
impacted by community water use, pond design, and climate. The greatest challenge arctic communities
experience when using passive wastewater treatment technologies is the constraints imposed by the
extreme climate, which is characterized as having long cold winters with short cool summers that can be
solar intense. The removal of carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD5), total suspended solids
(TSS), and ammonia-nitrogen were measured during the summer treatment period (late June until early
September) from 2011 to 2014 in the WSP systems of four Nunavut communities; Pond Inlet, Clyde River,
Grise Fiord and Kugaaruk. Monitoring results showed that WSPs in their current single cell design can
achieve greater than 80% removal of CBOD5 and TSS but were challenged to produce effluent quality that
meets secondary wastewater treatment standards (<25 mg/l CBOD5 and TSS). This study points to the
need for revisions of design guidelines for facultative WSPs in the Arctic, as current systems are anaerobic
and do not contain sufficient dissolved oxygen required to consistently support aerobic biological
treatment processes.
KW - Wastewater treatment
KW - Waste stabilization pond
KW - Biochemical oxygen demand
KW - Arctic
KW - Treatment performance
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.07.008
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0925-8574
VL - 83
SP - 413
EP - 421
JO - Ecological Engineering
JF - Ecological Engineering
ER -