Performance of multispecies assessment models: insights on the influence of diet data

Vanessa Trijoulet*, Gavin Fay, Kiersten L. Curti, Brian Smith, Timothy J. Miller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Multispecies stock assessment models require predator diet data, e.g. stomach samples. Diet data can be unavailable, sparse, of small sample size, or very noisy. It is unclear if multispecies interactions can be estimated without bias when interactions are weak. Research is needed about how model performance is affected by the availability or quality of diet data and by the method for fitting it. We developed seven age-structured operating models that simulate trophic interactions for two fish species and different scenarios of diet data availability or quality. The simulated data sets were fitted using four statistical catch-at-age models that estimated fishing, predation and residual natural mortality and differed in the way the diet data was fitted. Fitting the models to diet data averaged over time should be avoided since it resulted in estimation bias. Fitting annual diet composition per stomach produced bias estimates due to the occurrence of zeros in the observed proportions and the statistical assumptions for the diet model. Fitting to annual stomach proportions averaged across stomachs led to unbiased results even if the number of stomachs was small, the interactions were weak or some sampled years and ages were missing. These methods should be preferred when fitting multispecies models.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberfsz053
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume76
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1464-1476
Number of pages13
ISSN1054-3139
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Ecosystem-based fisheries management
  • Multispecies stock assessment
  • Predator diet
  • Simulation testing
  • Statistical catch-at-age model
  • Template Model Builder

Cite this

Trijoulet, Vanessa ; Fay, Gavin ; Curti, Kiersten L. ; Smith, Brian ; Miller, Timothy J. / Performance of multispecies assessment models: insights on the influence of diet data. In: ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2019 ; Vol. 76, No. 6. pp. 1464-1476.
@article{db03f419a8bc4adfb815261f54ab8710,
title = "Performance of multispecies assessment models: insights on the influence of diet data",
abstract = "Multispecies stock assessment models require predator diet data, e.g. stomach samples. Diet data can be unavailable, sparse, of small sample size, or very noisy. It is unclear if multispecies interactions can be estimated without bias when interactions are weak. Research is needed about how model performance is affected by the availability or quality of diet data and by the method for fitting it. We developed seven age-structured operating models that simulate trophic interactions for two fish species and different scenarios of diet data availability or quality. The simulated data sets were fitted using four statistical catch-at-age models that estimated fishing, predation and residual natural mortality and differed in the way the diet data was fitted. Fitting the models to diet data averaged over time should be avoided since it resulted in estimation bias. Fitting annual diet composition per stomach produced bias estimates due to the occurrence of zeros in the observed proportions and the statistical assumptions for the diet model. Fitting to annual stomach proportions averaged across stomachs led to unbiased results even if the number of stomachs was small, the interactions were weak or some sampled years and ages were missing. These methods should be preferred when fitting multispecies models.",
keywords = "Ecosystem-based fisheries management, Multispecies stock assessment, Predator diet, Simulation testing, Statistical catch-at-age model, Template Model Builder",
author = "Vanessa Trijoulet and Gavin Fay and Curti, {Kiersten L.} and Brian Smith and Miller, {Timothy J.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/icesjms/fsz053",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "1464--1476",
journal = "I C E S Journal of Marine Science",
issn = "1054-3139",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

Performance of multispecies assessment models: insights on the influence of diet data. / Trijoulet, Vanessa; Fay, Gavin; Curti, Kiersten L.; Smith, Brian; Miller, Timothy J.

In: ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 76, No. 6, fsz053, 2019, p. 1464-1476.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of multispecies assessment models: insights on the influence of diet data

AU - Trijoulet, Vanessa

AU - Fay, Gavin

AU - Curti, Kiersten L.

AU - Smith, Brian

AU - Miller, Timothy J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Multispecies stock assessment models require predator diet data, e.g. stomach samples. Diet data can be unavailable, sparse, of small sample size, or very noisy. It is unclear if multispecies interactions can be estimated without bias when interactions are weak. Research is needed about how model performance is affected by the availability or quality of diet data and by the method for fitting it. We developed seven age-structured operating models that simulate trophic interactions for two fish species and different scenarios of diet data availability or quality. The simulated data sets were fitted using four statistical catch-at-age models that estimated fishing, predation and residual natural mortality and differed in the way the diet data was fitted. Fitting the models to diet data averaged over time should be avoided since it resulted in estimation bias. Fitting annual diet composition per stomach produced bias estimates due to the occurrence of zeros in the observed proportions and the statistical assumptions for the diet model. Fitting to annual stomach proportions averaged across stomachs led to unbiased results even if the number of stomachs was small, the interactions were weak or some sampled years and ages were missing. These methods should be preferred when fitting multispecies models.

AB - Multispecies stock assessment models require predator diet data, e.g. stomach samples. Diet data can be unavailable, sparse, of small sample size, or very noisy. It is unclear if multispecies interactions can be estimated without bias when interactions are weak. Research is needed about how model performance is affected by the availability or quality of diet data and by the method for fitting it. We developed seven age-structured operating models that simulate trophic interactions for two fish species and different scenarios of diet data availability or quality. The simulated data sets were fitted using four statistical catch-at-age models that estimated fishing, predation and residual natural mortality and differed in the way the diet data was fitted. Fitting the models to diet data averaged over time should be avoided since it resulted in estimation bias. Fitting annual diet composition per stomach produced bias estimates due to the occurrence of zeros in the observed proportions and the statistical assumptions for the diet model. Fitting to annual stomach proportions averaged across stomachs led to unbiased results even if the number of stomachs was small, the interactions were weak or some sampled years and ages were missing. These methods should be preferred when fitting multispecies models.

KW - Ecosystem-based fisheries management

KW - Multispecies stock assessment

KW - Predator diet

KW - Simulation testing

KW - Statistical catch-at-age model

KW - Template Model Builder

U2 - 10.1093/icesjms/fsz053

DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fsz053

M3 - Journal article

VL - 76

SP - 1464

EP - 1476

JO - I C E S Journal of Marine Science

JF - I C E S Journal of Marine Science

SN - 1054-3139

IS - 6

M1 - fsz053

ER -