Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

Ivo Grigorov, Georgia Bayliss-Brown, David Murphy, Thomas Lindberg Thøgersen, Patrizio Mariani

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference abstract in journal › Research › peer-review

244 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number18355-2
JournalGeophysical Research Abstracts
Volume19
Number of pages1
ISSN1607-7962
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventEGU General Assembly 2017: European GEosciences Union 2017 - Vienna, Austria
Duration: 24 Apr 2017 → 28 Apr 2017
http://www.egu2017.eu

Conference

ConferenceEGU General Assembly 2017
CountryAustria
CityVienna
Period24/04/2017 → 28/04/2017
Internet address

Access to Document

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    • 1 Conference presentations

    Cite this