Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

Ivo Grigorov, Georgia Bayliss-Brown, David Murphy, Thomas Lindberg Thøgersen, Patrizio Mariani

Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

244 Downloads (Pure)


Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number18355-2
JournalGeophysical Research Abstracts
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventEGU General Assembly 2017: European GEosciences Union 2017 - Vienna, Austria
Duration: 24 Apr 201728 Apr 2017


ConferenceEGU General Assembly 2017
Internet address

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this