Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

Ivo Grigorov; Georgia Bayliss-Brown; David Murphy; Thomas Lindberg Thøgersen; Patrizio Mariani

Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

Ivo Grigorov, Georgia Bayliss-Brown, David Murphy, Thomas Lindberg Thøgersen, Patrizio Mariani

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference abstract in journal › Research › peer-review

253 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.

Original language	English
Article number	18355-2
Journal	Geophysical Research Abstracts
Volume	19
Number of pages	1
ISSN	1607-7962
Publication status	Published - 2017
Event	EGU General Assembly 2017: European GEosciences Union 2017 - Vienna, Austria Duration: 24 Apr 2017 → 28 Apr 2017 http://www.egu2017.eu

Conference

Conference	EGU General Assembly 2017
Country/Territory	Austria
City	Vienna
Period	24/04/2017 → 28/04/2017
Internet address	http://www.egu2017.eu

Access to Document

EGU2017 18355 2Final published version, 38.4 KB

SFX availability

Full text

1 Conference presentations

EGU2017-18355 Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact
Ivo Grigorov (Speaker), Georgia Bayliss-Brown (Other), David Murphy (Other), Thomas Lindberg Thøgersen (Other) & Patrizio Mariani (Other)
24 Apr 2017
Activity: Talks and presentations › Conference presentations

File

Cite this

@article{34e7c72e348b4171b311d815ee51af77,

title = "Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact",

abstract = "Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.",

author = "Ivo Grigorov and Georgia Bayliss-Brown and David Murphy and Th{\o}gersen, {Thomas Lindberg} and Patrizio Mariani",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

journal = "Geophysical Research Abstracts",

issn = "1607-7962",

publisher = "Copernicus GmbH",

note = "EGU General Assembly 2017 : European GEosciences Union 2017, EGU2017 ; Conference date: 24-04-2017 Through 28-04-2017",

url = "http://www.egu2017.eu",

}

TY - ABST

T1 - Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

AU - Grigorov, Ivo

AU - Bayliss-Brown, Georgia

AU - Murphy, David

AU - Thøgersen, Thomas Lindberg

AU - Mariani, Patrizio

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.

AB - Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.

M3 - Conference abstract in journal

VL - 19

JO - Geophysical Research Abstracts

JF - Geophysical Research Abstracts

SN - 1607-7962

M1 - 18355-2

T2 - EGU General Assembly 2017

Y2 - 24 April 2017 through 28 April 2017

ER -

Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

SFX availability

Fingerprint

Activities

EGU2017-18355 Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

Cite this