Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

Ivo Grigorov, Georgia Bayliss-Brown, David Murphy, Thomas Lindberg Thøgersen, Patrizio Mariani

Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

197 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number18355-2
JournalGeophysical Research Abstracts
Volume19
Number of pages1
ISSN1607-7962
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventEGU General Assembly 2017: European GEosciences Union 2017 - Vienna, Austria
Duration: 24 Apr 201728 Apr 2017
http://www.egu2017.eu

Conference

ConferenceEGU General Assembly 2017
CountryAustria
CityVienna
Period24/04/201728/04/2017
Internet address

Cite this

Grigorov, Ivo ; Bayliss-Brown, Georgia ; Murphy, David ; Thøgersen, Thomas Lindberg ; Mariani, Patrizio. / Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact. In: Geophysical Research Abstracts. 2017 ; Vol. 19.
@article{34e7c72e348b4171b311d815ee51af77,
title = "Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact",
abstract = "Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.",
author = "Ivo Grigorov and Georgia Bayliss-Brown and David Murphy and Th{\o}gersen, {Thomas Lindberg} and Patrizio Mariani",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Geophysical Research Abstracts",
issn = "1607-7962",
publisher = "Copernicus GmbH",

}

Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact. / Grigorov, Ivo; Bayliss-Brown, Georgia; Murphy, David; Thøgersen, Thomas Lindberg; Mariani, Patrizio.

In: Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 19, 18355-2, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

TY - ABST

T1 - Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact

AU - Grigorov, Ivo

AU - Bayliss-Brown, Georgia

AU - Murphy, David

AU - Thøgersen, Thomas Lindberg

AU - Mariani, Patrizio

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.

AB - Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.

M3 - Conference abstract in journal

VL - 19

JO - Geophysical Research Abstracts

JF - Geophysical Research Abstracts

SN - 1607-7962

M1 - 18355-2

ER -