Abstract
Research funders are increasingly concerned with measurable socio-economic impact of investment in research, and on increasingly shorter timescales. Innovation, and “open innovation” are the policy priorities of the moment and optimising the flow of ideas along the lab-2-market spectrum is essential for re-use of results, fuelling open innovation, and boosting socio-economic impact or public funded research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 18355-2 |
| Journal | Geophysical Research Abstracts |
| Volume | 19 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| ISSN | 1607-7962 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Event | EGU General Assembly 2017: European GEosciences Union 2017 - Vienna, Austria Duration: 24 Apr 2017 → 28 Apr 2017 http://www.egu2017.eu |
Conference
| Conference | EGU General Assembly 2017 |
|---|---|
| Country | Austria |
| City | Vienna |
| Period | 24/04/2017 → 28/04/2017 |
| Internet address |
Cite this
Grigorov, I., Bayliss-Brown, G., Murphy, D., Thøgersen, T. L., & Mariani, P. (2017). Passive vs Active Knowledge Transfer: boosting grant proposal impact. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 19, [18355-2].