Optimizing healthy and safe fish intake recommendations: a trade-off between personal preference and cost

Maria Persson*, Sisse Fagt, Maarten J Nauta

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Individuals may perceive personalized dietary advice as more relevant and motivational than national guidelines. Personal preference and food cost are factors that can affect consumer decisions. The objective of this study was to present a method for modelling and analysing the trade-off between deviation from preference and food cost for optimized personalized dietary recommendations. Quadratic programming was applied to minimize deviation from fish preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost for 3,016 Danish adults (whose dietary intake and body weight were recorded in a national dietary survey). Model constraints included recommendations for eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and vitamin D and tolerable levels for methyl mercury, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCBs). When only minimizing deviation from preference, 50% of the study population should be recommended to increase fish intake, 48% should be suggested to maintain current consumption, and 2%, should be suggested to decrease fish consumption. When only minimizing cost, the vast majority (99%) should be recommended to only consume herring, which is the least-expensive fish species. By minimizing deviation from preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost, personalized optimal trade-off curves between deviation from fish intake preference and fish cost could be generated for each individual in our study population, except for 22 individuals (0.7%) whose contaminant background exposure was too high. In the future, the method of this paper could be applied in the personal communication of healthy and safe food recommendations that fit the preferences of individual consumers.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume122
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)206-219
ISSN0007-1145
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • cost
  • optimal trade-off curve
  • personal food preference
  • personalized intake recommendations
  • quadratic programming

Cite this

@article{4f2ca805ce3d47089405fecf45591929,
title = "Optimizing healthy and safe fish intake recommendations: a trade-off between personal preference and cost",
abstract = "Individuals may perceive personalized dietary advice as more relevant and motivational than national guidelines. Personal preference and food cost are factors that can affect consumer decisions. The objective of this study was to present a method for modelling and analysing the trade-off between deviation from preference and food cost for optimized personalized dietary recommendations. Quadratic programming was applied to minimize deviation from fish preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost for 3,016 Danish adults (whose dietary intake and body weight were recorded in a national dietary survey). Model constraints included recommendations for eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and vitamin D and tolerable levels for methyl mercury, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCBs). When only minimizing deviation from preference, 50{\%} of the study population should be recommended to increase fish intake, 48{\%} should be suggested to maintain current consumption, and 2{\%}, should be suggested to decrease fish consumption. When only minimizing cost, the vast majority (99{\%}) should be recommended to only consume herring, which is the least-expensive fish species. By minimizing deviation from preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost, personalized optimal trade-off curves between deviation from fish intake preference and fish cost could be generated for each individual in our study population, except for 22 individuals (0.7{\%}) whose contaminant background exposure was too high. In the future, the method of this paper could be applied in the personal communication of healthy and safe food recommendations that fit the preferences of individual consumers.",
keywords = "cost, optimal trade-off curve, personal food preference, personalized intake recommendations, quadratic programming",
author = "Maria Persson and Sisse Fagt and Nauta, {Maarten J}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1017/S0007114519000989",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "206--219",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Optimizing healthy and safe fish intake recommendations: a trade-off between personal preference and cost. / Persson, Maria; Fagt, Sisse; Nauta, Maarten J.

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 122, No. 2, 2019, p. 206-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing healthy and safe fish intake recommendations: a trade-off between personal preference and cost

AU - Persson, Maria

AU - Fagt, Sisse

AU - Nauta, Maarten J

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Individuals may perceive personalized dietary advice as more relevant and motivational than national guidelines. Personal preference and food cost are factors that can affect consumer decisions. The objective of this study was to present a method for modelling and analysing the trade-off between deviation from preference and food cost for optimized personalized dietary recommendations. Quadratic programming was applied to minimize deviation from fish preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost for 3,016 Danish adults (whose dietary intake and body weight were recorded in a national dietary survey). Model constraints included recommendations for eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and vitamin D and tolerable levels for methyl mercury, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCBs). When only minimizing deviation from preference, 50% of the study population should be recommended to increase fish intake, 48% should be suggested to maintain current consumption, and 2%, should be suggested to decrease fish consumption. When only minimizing cost, the vast majority (99%) should be recommended to only consume herring, which is the least-expensive fish species. By minimizing deviation from preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost, personalized optimal trade-off curves between deviation from fish intake preference and fish cost could be generated for each individual in our study population, except for 22 individuals (0.7%) whose contaminant background exposure was too high. In the future, the method of this paper could be applied in the personal communication of healthy and safe food recommendations that fit the preferences of individual consumers.

AB - Individuals may perceive personalized dietary advice as more relevant and motivational than national guidelines. Personal preference and food cost are factors that can affect consumer decisions. The objective of this study was to present a method for modelling and analysing the trade-off between deviation from preference and food cost for optimized personalized dietary recommendations. Quadratic programming was applied to minimize deviation from fish preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost for 3,016 Danish adults (whose dietary intake and body weight were recorded in a national dietary survey). Model constraints included recommendations for eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and vitamin D and tolerable levels for methyl mercury, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCBs). When only minimizing deviation from preference, 50% of the study population should be recommended to increase fish intake, 48% should be suggested to maintain current consumption, and 2%, should be suggested to decrease fish consumption. When only minimizing cost, the vast majority (99%) should be recommended to only consume herring, which is the least-expensive fish species. By minimizing deviation from preference and cost simultaneously with different weights on the cost, personalized optimal trade-off curves between deviation from fish intake preference and fish cost could be generated for each individual in our study population, except for 22 individuals (0.7%) whose contaminant background exposure was too high. In the future, the method of this paper could be applied in the personal communication of healthy and safe food recommendations that fit the preferences of individual consumers.

KW - cost

KW - optimal trade-off curve

KW - personal food preference

KW - personalized intake recommendations

KW - quadratic programming

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114519000989

DO - 10.1017/S0007114519000989

M3 - Journal article

VL - 122

SP - 206

EP - 219

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 2

ER -