Optimising testing strategies for classification of human health and environmental hazards - a proof-of-concept study

Emilie Da Silva, Anders Baun*, Elisabet Berggren, Andrew Worth

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper outlines a new concept to optimise testing strategies for improving the efficiency of chemical testing for hazard-based risk management. While chemical classification based on standard checklists of information triggers risk management measures, the link is not one-to-one. Toxicity testing may be performed with no impact on chemical safety. Each hazard class and category is not assigned a unique pictogram and for the purpose of this proof-of-concept study, the level of concern for a chemical for the population and the environment is simplistically considered to be reflected by the hazard pictograms. Using active substances in biocides and plant protection products as dataset, three testing strategies were built with the boundary condition that an optimal approach must indicate a given level of concern while requiring less testing (strategy B), prioritising new approach methodologies (strategy C) or combining the two considerations (strategy D). The implementation of the strategies B and D reduced the number of tests performed by 6.0% to 8.8% and strategy C relied the least on in vivo methods. The intentionally simplistic approach to optimised testing strategies presented here could be used beyond the assessment of biocides and plant protection products to gain efficiencies in the safety assessment of other chemical groups, saving animals and making regulatory testing more time- and cost-efficient.
Original languageEnglish
JournalToxicology Letters
ISSN0378-4274
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising testing strategies for classification of human health and environmental hazards - a proof-of-concept study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this