Optimal carbon dioxide abatement and technological change: should taxes start high in order to spur R&D?

Mads Greaker, Lise-Lotte Pade

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Many European politicians argue that the EU should set tougher emission targets than what is required by the Kyoto protocol, and moreover, that emission trading with other countries outside EU should be limited so as to keep emission quota prices high. One of the arguments, frequently cited for such a policy, is the need for technological development. However, the literature on climate change and technological innovation does not unambiguously support the need for setting high emission taxes today. In this paper we investigate the relationship between emission taxes and technological change further by modeling innovation activity explicitly. In our model both the amount of R&D and the amount of carbon abatement are decided in a decentralized way by the market as a response to an emission tax. Moreover, we introduce several distinct failures in the market for new innovations, among others, insufficient patent protection and intertemporal knowledge spillovers. Our findings suggest that governments should under some circumstances set a higher carbon tax today if we have technological change driven by R&D than if we have pure exogenous technological change. Based on numerical simulations these circumstances are (a) positive intertemporal knowledge spillovers and/or (b) weak patent protection.
Original languageEnglish
JournalClimatic Change
Volume96
Pages (from-to)335-355
ISSN0165-0009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{f588c282207a499e8f97db748955de60,
title = "Optimal carbon dioxide abatement and technological change: should taxes start high in order to spur R&D?",
abstract = "Many European politicians argue that the EU should set tougher emission targets than what is required by the Kyoto protocol, and moreover, that emission trading with other countries outside EU should be limited so as to keep emission quota prices high. One of the arguments, frequently cited for such a policy, is the need for technological development. However, the literature on climate change and technological innovation does not unambiguously support the need for setting high emission taxes today. In this paper we investigate the relationship between emission taxes and technological change further by modeling innovation activity explicitly. In our model both the amount of R&D and the amount of carbon abatement are decided in a decentralized way by the market as a response to an emission tax. Moreover, we introduce several distinct failures in the market for new innovations, among others, insufficient patent protection and intertemporal knowledge spillovers. Our findings suggest that governments should under some circumstances set a higher carbon tax today if we have technological change driven by R&D than if we have pure exogenous technological change. Based on numerical simulations these circumstances are (a) positive intertemporal knowledge spillovers and/or (b) weak patent protection.",
author = "Mads Greaker and Lise-Lotte Pade",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-009-9643-x",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "335--355",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Optimal carbon dioxide abatement and technological change: should taxes start high in order to spur R&D? / Greaker, Mads; Pade, Lise-Lotte.

In: Climatic Change, Vol. 96, 2009, p. 335-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal carbon dioxide abatement and technological change: should taxes start high in order to spur R&D?

AU - Greaker, Mads

AU - Pade, Lise-Lotte

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Many European politicians argue that the EU should set tougher emission targets than what is required by the Kyoto protocol, and moreover, that emission trading with other countries outside EU should be limited so as to keep emission quota prices high. One of the arguments, frequently cited for such a policy, is the need for technological development. However, the literature on climate change and technological innovation does not unambiguously support the need for setting high emission taxes today. In this paper we investigate the relationship between emission taxes and technological change further by modeling innovation activity explicitly. In our model both the amount of R&D and the amount of carbon abatement are decided in a decentralized way by the market as a response to an emission tax. Moreover, we introduce several distinct failures in the market for new innovations, among others, insufficient patent protection and intertemporal knowledge spillovers. Our findings suggest that governments should under some circumstances set a higher carbon tax today if we have technological change driven by R&D than if we have pure exogenous technological change. Based on numerical simulations these circumstances are (a) positive intertemporal knowledge spillovers and/or (b) weak patent protection.

AB - Many European politicians argue that the EU should set tougher emission targets than what is required by the Kyoto protocol, and moreover, that emission trading with other countries outside EU should be limited so as to keep emission quota prices high. One of the arguments, frequently cited for such a policy, is the need for technological development. However, the literature on climate change and technological innovation does not unambiguously support the need for setting high emission taxes today. In this paper we investigate the relationship between emission taxes and technological change further by modeling innovation activity explicitly. In our model both the amount of R&D and the amount of carbon abatement are decided in a decentralized way by the market as a response to an emission tax. Moreover, we introduce several distinct failures in the market for new innovations, among others, insufficient patent protection and intertemporal knowledge spillovers. Our findings suggest that governments should under some circumstances set a higher carbon tax today if we have technological change driven by R&D than if we have pure exogenous technological change. Based on numerical simulations these circumstances are (a) positive intertemporal knowledge spillovers and/or (b) weak patent protection.

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-009-9643-x

DO - 10.1007/s10584-009-9643-x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 96

SP - 335

EP - 355

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

ER -