On the missing link in ecology: improving communication between modellers and experimentalists

Jan Heuschele, Mikael T. Ekvall, Patrizio Mariani, Christian Lindemann

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Collaboration between modellers and experimentalists is essential in ecological research, however, different obstacles linking both camps often hinder scientific progress. In this commentary, we discuss several issues of the current state of affairs in this research loop. Backed by an online survey amongst fellow ecologists, modellers and experimentalists alike, we identify two major areas that need to be mended. Firstly, differences in language and jargon lead to a lack of exchange of ideas and to unrealistic mutual expectations. And secondly, constraint data sharing, accessibility and quality limit the usage of empirical data and thereby the impact of ecological studies. We discuss ways to advance collaboration; how to improve communication and the design of experiments; and the sharing of data. We hope to start a much-needed conversation between modellers and experimentalists, to further future research collaboration and to increase the impact of single ecological studies alike.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOikos
Volume126
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1071-1077
ISSN0030-1299
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

Heuschele, Jan ; Ekvall, Mikael T. ; Mariani, Patrizio ; Lindemann, Christian. / On the missing link in ecology: improving communication between modellers and experimentalists. In: Oikos. 2017 ; Vol. 126, No. 8. pp. 1071-1077.
@article{da6f60cc32e540f892b4f76ae344ab3d,
title = "On the missing link in ecology: improving communication between modellers and experimentalists",
abstract = "Collaboration between modellers and experimentalists is essential in ecological research, however, different obstacles linking both camps often hinder scientific progress. In this commentary, we discuss several issues of the current state of affairs in this research loop. Backed by an online survey amongst fellow ecologists, modellers and experimentalists alike, we identify two major areas that need to be mended. Firstly, differences in language and jargon lead to a lack of exchange of ideas and to unrealistic mutual expectations. And secondly, constraint data sharing, accessibility and quality limit the usage of empirical data and thereby the impact of ecological studies. We discuss ways to advance collaboration; how to improve communication and the design of experiments; and the sharing of data. We hope to start a much-needed conversation between modellers and experimentalists, to further future research collaboration and to increase the impact of single ecological studies alike.",
author = "Jan Heuschele and Ekvall, {Mikael T.} and Patrizio Mariani and Christian Lindemann",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/oik.03885",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "1071--1077",
journal = "Oikos",
issn = "0030-1299",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

On the missing link in ecology: improving communication between modellers and experimentalists. / Heuschele, Jan; Ekvall, Mikael T.; Mariani, Patrizio; Lindemann, Christian.

In: Oikos, Vol. 126, No. 8, 2017, p. 1071-1077.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the missing link in ecology: improving communication between modellers and experimentalists

AU - Heuschele, Jan

AU - Ekvall, Mikael T.

AU - Mariani, Patrizio

AU - Lindemann, Christian

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Collaboration between modellers and experimentalists is essential in ecological research, however, different obstacles linking both camps often hinder scientific progress. In this commentary, we discuss several issues of the current state of affairs in this research loop. Backed by an online survey amongst fellow ecologists, modellers and experimentalists alike, we identify two major areas that need to be mended. Firstly, differences in language and jargon lead to a lack of exchange of ideas and to unrealistic mutual expectations. And secondly, constraint data sharing, accessibility and quality limit the usage of empirical data and thereby the impact of ecological studies. We discuss ways to advance collaboration; how to improve communication and the design of experiments; and the sharing of data. We hope to start a much-needed conversation between modellers and experimentalists, to further future research collaboration and to increase the impact of single ecological studies alike.

AB - Collaboration between modellers and experimentalists is essential in ecological research, however, different obstacles linking both camps often hinder scientific progress. In this commentary, we discuss several issues of the current state of affairs in this research loop. Backed by an online survey amongst fellow ecologists, modellers and experimentalists alike, we identify two major areas that need to be mended. Firstly, differences in language and jargon lead to a lack of exchange of ideas and to unrealistic mutual expectations. And secondly, constraint data sharing, accessibility and quality limit the usage of empirical data and thereby the impact of ecological studies. We discuss ways to advance collaboration; how to improve communication and the design of experiments; and the sharing of data. We hope to start a much-needed conversation between modellers and experimentalists, to further future research collaboration and to increase the impact of single ecological studies alike.

U2 - 10.1111/oik.03885

DO - 10.1111/oik.03885

M3 - Journal article

VL - 126

SP - 1071

EP - 1077

JO - Oikos

JF - Oikos

SN - 0030-1299

IS - 8

ER -