On the interaction between two oppositely signed, shielded, monopolar vortices

M.R. Schmidt, M. Beckers, A.H. Nielsen, J. Juul Rasmussen, G.J.F. van Heijst

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

    Abstract

    The formation two-dimensional dipolar vortices by the interaction between two shielded monopolar vortices with opposite vorticity, as shown in a numerical study by Couder and Basdevant,(1) is investigated in detail, both experimentally, in a nonrotating stratified fluid and numerically by direct solutions of the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. A comparative study between the laboratory experiments and numerical simulations is performed. The vorticity distribution measured in the early stage of the evolution in the laboratory is used as initial data for the simulations, and an additional damping term in the Navier-Stokes equations, that accounts for the vertical diffusion in the laboratory experiments, is used. The results show that, depending on the initial separation between the vortices, the shields of the monopoles are peeled off and indeed a compact dipole with a linear (omega,psi)-relationship is formed, or when the monopoles are further apart the shields of the monopoles are perturbed and two tripoles are formed. The characteristics of the emerged dipole are analyzed and a dye visualization of the dipole formation is performed. A second, more general numerical study yields a relationship between the formation time of the dipole and the initial separation distance between the monopoles and it shows that the deshielding process can be explained by the domination of strain over vorticity. (C) 1998 American Institute of Physics. [S1070-6631(98)02212-0].
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalPhysics of Fluids
    Volume10
    Issue number12
    Pages (from-to)3099-3110
    ISSN1070-6631
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1998

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the interaction between two oppositely signed, shielded, monopolar vortices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this