On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS

Guilherme B. Saturnino, André Antunes, Axel Thielscher

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses electrode pads placed on the head to deliver weak direct current to the brain and modulate neuronal excitability. The effects depend on the intensity and spatial distribution of the electric field. This in turn depends on the geometry and electric properties of the head tissues and electrode pads. Previous numerical studies focused on providing a reasonable level of detail of the head anatomy, often using simplified electrode models. Here, we explore via finite element method (FEM) simulations based on a high-resolution head model how detailed electrode modeling influences the calculated electric field in the brain. We take into account electrode shape, size, connector position and conductivities of different electrode materials (including saline solutions and electrode gels). These factors are systematically characterized to demonstrate their impact on the field distribution in the brain. The goals are to assess the effect of simplified electrode models; and to develop practical rules-of-thumb to achieve a stronger stimulation of the targeted brain regions underneath the electrode pads. We show that for standard rectangular electrode pads, lower saline and gel conductivities result in more homogeneous fields in the region of interest (ROI). Placing the connector at the center of the electrode pad or farthest from the second electrode substantially increases the field strength in the ROI. Our results highlight the importance of detailed electrode modeling and of having an adequate selection of electrode pads/gels in experiments. We also advise for a more detailed reporting of the electrode montages when conducting tDCS experiments, as different configurations significantly affect the results.
Copyright 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuroImage
Volume120
Pages (from-to)25-35
ISSN1053-8119
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation
  • Field calculations
  • Finite element method
  • Electrode modeling
  • Spatial targeting

Cite this

@article{5333627ae4714fe5a673ce500cd344bc,
title = "On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS",
abstract = "Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses electrode pads placed on the head to deliver weak direct current to the brain and modulate neuronal excitability. The effects depend on the intensity and spatial distribution of the electric field. This in turn depends on the geometry and electric properties of the head tissues and electrode pads. Previous numerical studies focused on providing a reasonable level of detail of the head anatomy, often using simplified electrode models. Here, we explore via finite element method (FEM) simulations based on a high-resolution head model how detailed electrode modeling influences the calculated electric field in the brain. We take into account electrode shape, size, connector position and conductivities of different electrode materials (including saline solutions and electrode gels). These factors are systematically characterized to demonstrate their impact on the field distribution in the brain. The goals are to assess the effect of simplified electrode models; and to develop practical rules-of-thumb to achieve a stronger stimulation of the targeted brain regions underneath the electrode pads. We show that for standard rectangular electrode pads, lower saline and gel conductivities result in more homogeneous fields in the region of interest (ROI). Placing the connector at the center of the electrode pad or farthest from the second electrode substantially increases the field strength in the ROI. Our results highlight the importance of detailed electrode modeling and of having an adequate selection of electrode pads/gels in experiments. We also advise for a more detailed reporting of the electrode montages when conducting tDCS experiments, as different configurations significantly affect the results.Copyright 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Transcranial direct current stimulation, Field calculations, Finite element method, Electrode modeling, Spatial targeting",
author = "{B. Saturnino}, Guilherme and Andr{\'e} Antunes and Axel Thielscher",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.067",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "25--35",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS. / B. Saturnino, Guilherme; Antunes, André; Thielscher, Axel.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 120, 2015, p. 25-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS

AU - B. Saturnino, Guilherme

AU - Antunes, André

AU - Thielscher, Axel

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses electrode pads placed on the head to deliver weak direct current to the brain and modulate neuronal excitability. The effects depend on the intensity and spatial distribution of the electric field. This in turn depends on the geometry and electric properties of the head tissues and electrode pads. Previous numerical studies focused on providing a reasonable level of detail of the head anatomy, often using simplified electrode models. Here, we explore via finite element method (FEM) simulations based on a high-resolution head model how detailed electrode modeling influences the calculated electric field in the brain. We take into account electrode shape, size, connector position and conductivities of different electrode materials (including saline solutions and electrode gels). These factors are systematically characterized to demonstrate their impact on the field distribution in the brain. The goals are to assess the effect of simplified electrode models; and to develop practical rules-of-thumb to achieve a stronger stimulation of the targeted brain regions underneath the electrode pads. We show that for standard rectangular electrode pads, lower saline and gel conductivities result in more homogeneous fields in the region of interest (ROI). Placing the connector at the center of the electrode pad or farthest from the second electrode substantially increases the field strength in the ROI. Our results highlight the importance of detailed electrode modeling and of having an adequate selection of electrode pads/gels in experiments. We also advise for a more detailed reporting of the electrode montages when conducting tDCS experiments, as different configurations significantly affect the results.Copyright 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses electrode pads placed on the head to deliver weak direct current to the brain and modulate neuronal excitability. The effects depend on the intensity and spatial distribution of the electric field. This in turn depends on the geometry and electric properties of the head tissues and electrode pads. Previous numerical studies focused on providing a reasonable level of detail of the head anatomy, often using simplified electrode models. Here, we explore via finite element method (FEM) simulations based on a high-resolution head model how detailed electrode modeling influences the calculated electric field in the brain. We take into account electrode shape, size, connector position and conductivities of different electrode materials (including saline solutions and electrode gels). These factors are systematically characterized to demonstrate their impact on the field distribution in the brain. The goals are to assess the effect of simplified electrode models; and to develop practical rules-of-thumb to achieve a stronger stimulation of the targeted brain regions underneath the electrode pads. We show that for standard rectangular electrode pads, lower saline and gel conductivities result in more homogeneous fields in the region of interest (ROI). Placing the connector at the center of the electrode pad or farthest from the second electrode substantially increases the field strength in the ROI. Our results highlight the importance of detailed electrode modeling and of having an adequate selection of electrode pads/gels in experiments. We also advise for a more detailed reporting of the electrode montages when conducting tDCS experiments, as different configurations significantly affect the results.Copyright 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation

KW - Field calculations

KW - Finite element method

KW - Electrode modeling

KW - Spatial targeting

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.067

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.067

M3 - Journal article

VL - 120

SP - 25

EP - 35

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -