On strength of porous material: simple systems and densified systems

Lauge Fuglsang Nielsen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review


    The question of non-destructive testing of porous materials has always been of interest for the engineering profession. A number of empirically based MOE-MOR relations between stiffness (Modulus Of Elasticity) and strength (Modulus OF Rupture) of materials have been established in order to control quality without damaging or destroying the material or the building component considered. The efficiency of MOE-MOR relations for this purpose depends very much on the homogeneity of porous material considered. For building materials like wood and concrete of normal or lower quality with a number of irregularities only scattered MOE-MOR relations (clouds) can be established from which no really results can be read.For homogeneously produced porous materials, however, like modern ceramics and high performance concretes MOE-MOR relations can be presented which are reliable. The present paper contributes to the theoretical research on non-destructive testing of such materials relating strength to stiffness and pore geometry.It is demonstrated that solutions for stiffness, tensile strength, and pore strength (damaging pore pressure, frost, fire) for some ideal porous materials can be determined theoretically only from knowing about pore geometry, solid phase stiffness, and zero-porosity strength. Pore geometry is the very important common denominator which controls both both stiffness and strength.The accurate results obtained are finally used to suggest generalizations with respect to strength in general (tensile, compression, flexural), pore strength, and stiffness versus more realistic pore systems. The expressions suggested are positively evaluated against a number of experimental data reporduced from the literature.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationOn strength of porous material
    Publication date1999
    Publication statusPublished - 1999

    Cite this