Abstract
Recent Letters by Piggott et al. 1 and Shen et al. 2 claim the smallest ever dielectric wave length and polarization splitters. The associated News & Views article by Aydin3 states that these works “are the first experimental demonstration of on-chip, silicon photonic components based on complex all-dielectric nanophotonic structures.” Here, we question the rationale behind the competition for a small device footprint as set out by the authors of the two papers 1,2 and also point out a lack of appropriate historical context in the three contributions 1–3.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Nature Photonics |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 142-143 |
| ISSN | 1749-4885 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On nanostructured silicon success'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver