TY - JOUR
T1 - Oil and gas pipelines with hydrophobic surfaces better equipped to deal with gas hydrate flow assurance issues
AU - Perfeldt, Christine Malmos
AU - Sharifi, Hassan
AU - von Solms, Nicolas
AU - Englezos, Peter
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Gas hydrate deposition can cause plugging in oil and gas pipelines with resultant flow assurance challenges. Presently, the energy industry uses chemical additives in order to manage hydrate formation, however these chemicals are expensive and may be associated with safety and environmental concerns. Here we show the effect of a hydrophobically coated surface on hydrate formation in the presence of an antifreeze protein type I (AFP I) and a biodegradable synthetic polymer (LuvicapBio) in a high pressure crystallizer setup. The hydrophobic surface increased the hydrate induction time and reduced the hydrate growth significantly in pure deionized water (control). Furthermore, in the presence of 0.02 wt% of LuvicapBio or 0.014 wt% AFP I in the hydrophobic coated crystallizer; the hydrate growth was reduced to almost the same level as obtained with 0.20 wt% of LuvicapBio in a stainless steel crystallizer. This indicates that 10 to 14 times less KHI is needed in the presence of a hydrophobically coated surface. These experimental studies suggest that the use of hydrophobic surfaces or pipelines could serve as an alternative or additional flow assurance approach for gas hydration mitigation and management.
AB - Gas hydrate deposition can cause plugging in oil and gas pipelines with resultant flow assurance challenges. Presently, the energy industry uses chemical additives in order to manage hydrate formation, however these chemicals are expensive and may be associated with safety and environmental concerns. Here we show the effect of a hydrophobically coated surface on hydrate formation in the presence of an antifreeze protein type I (AFP I) and a biodegradable synthetic polymer (LuvicapBio) in a high pressure crystallizer setup. The hydrophobic surface increased the hydrate induction time and reduced the hydrate growth significantly in pure deionized water (control). Furthermore, in the presence of 0.02 wt% of LuvicapBio or 0.014 wt% AFP I in the hydrophobic coated crystallizer; the hydrate growth was reduced to almost the same level as obtained with 0.20 wt% of LuvicapBio in a stainless steel crystallizer. This indicates that 10 to 14 times less KHI is needed in the presence of a hydrophobically coated surface. These experimental studies suggest that the use of hydrophobic surfaces or pipelines could serve as an alternative or additional flow assurance approach for gas hydration mitigation and management.
KW - Flow assurance issues
KW - Hydrophobic surfaces
KW - Kinetic gas hydrate inhibitors
U2 - 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.044
DO - 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.044
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1875-5100
VL - 27
SP - 852
EP - 861
JO - Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering
JF - Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering
ER -