Observations on the systematic deviations between the results
                of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of
                measuring transmission loss

Finn Jacobsen; Hui Ding

Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss

Finn Jacobsen, Hui Ding

Beijing Municipal Institute of Labour Protection

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years
Place of Publication	St Albans
Publisher	Institute of Acoustics
Publication date	1996
Pages	2719-2724
Publication status	Published - 1996
Event	The 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering - Liverpool, United Kingdom Duration: 30 Jul 1996 → 2 Aug 1996

Conference

Conference	The 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering
Country/Territory	United Kingdom
City	Liverpool
Period	30/07/1996 → 02/08/1996

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@inproceedings{13d065ef46c74208b8d1d6716f1d86e4,

title = "Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss",

abstract = "Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.",

author = "Finn Jacobsen and Hui Ding",

year = "1996",

language = "English",

pages = "2719--2724",

booktitle = "Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years",

publisher = "Institute of Acoustics",

note = "The 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering ; Conference date: 30-07-1996 Through 02-08-1996",

}

Jacobsen, F & Ding, H 1996, Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss. in Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years. Institute of Acoustics, St Albans, pp. 2719-2724, The 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 30/07/1996.

Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss. / Jacobsen, Finn; Ding, Hui.
Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years. St Albans: Institute of Acoustics, 1996. p. 2719-2724.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss

AU - Jacobsen, Finn

AU - Ding, Hui

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.

AB - Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.

M3 - Article in proceedings

SP - 2719

EP - 2724

BT - Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years

PB - Institute of Acoustics

CY - St Albans

T2 - The 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering

Y2 - 30 July 1996 through 2 August 1996

ER -