Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss

Finn Jacobsen, Hui Ding

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationInter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years
    Place of PublicationSt Albans
    PublisherInstitute of Acoustics
    Publication date1996
    Pages2719-2724
    Publication statusPublished - 1996
    EventThe 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering - Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Duration: 30 Jul 19962 Aug 1996

    Conference

    ConferenceThe 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering
    CountryUnited Kingdom
    CityLiverpool
    Period30/07/199602/08/1996

    Cite this

    Jacobsen, F., & Ding, H. (1996). Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss. In Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years (pp. 2719-2724). St Albans: Institute of Acoustics.
    Jacobsen, Finn ; Ding, Hui. / Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss. Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years. St Albans : Institute of Acoustics, 1996. pp. 2719-2724
    @inproceedings{13d065ef46c74208b8d1d6716f1d86e4,
    title = "Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss",
    abstract = "Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.",
    author = "Finn Jacobsen and Hui Ding",
    year = "1996",
    language = "English",
    pages = "2719--2724",
    booktitle = "Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years",
    publisher = "Institute of Acoustics",

    }

    Jacobsen, F & Ding, H 1996, Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss. in Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years. Institute of Acoustics, St Albans, pp. 2719-2724, The 1996 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 30/07/1996.

    Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss. / Jacobsen, Finn; Ding, Hui.

    Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years. St Albans : Institute of Acoustics, 1996. p. 2719-2724.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss

    AU - Jacobsen, Finn

    AU - Ding, Hui

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.

    AB - Possible explanations of the often reported systematic deviations between the results of conventional and intensity-based measurements of sound transmission loss are examined. Both the conventional diffuse-field method and the method based on measurement of sound intensity are subject to several fairly small but systematic errors of comparable size. The errors are more or less under the control of the experimenter. It is concluded that with very careful measurement procedures there are no systematic deviations between the two methods of determining transmission loss.

    M3 - Article in proceedings

    SP - 2719

    EP - 2724

    BT - Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years

    PB - Institute of Acoustics

    CY - St Albans

    ER -

    Jacobsen F, Ding H. Observations on the systematic deviations between the results of the conventional method and the sound intensity method of measuring transmission loss. In Inter-Noise 96, Noise Control - The Next 25 Years. St Albans: Institute of Acoustics. 1996. p. 2719-2724