Abstract
We show comparison of four different numerical methods for
simulating Photonic-Crystal (PC) VCSELs. We present the theoretical basis behind each method and analyze the differences by studying a benchmark VCSEL structure, where the PC structure penetrates all VCSEL layers, the
entire top-mirror DBR, a fraction of the top-mirror DBR or just the VCSEL cavity. The different models are evaluated by comparing the predicted resonance wavelengths and threshold gains for different hole diameters and pitches of the PC. The agreement between the models is relatively good, except for one model, which corresponds to the effective index method. The simulation results elucidate the strength and weaknesses of the analyzed
methods; and outline the limits of applicability of the different models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Optics Express |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 15 |
| Pages (from-to) | 16042-16054 |
| ISSN | 1094-4087 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Bibliographical note
This paper was published in Optics Express and is made available as an electronic reprint with the permission of OSA. The paper can be found at the following URL on the OSA website: http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-18-15-16042. Systematic or multiple reproduction or distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Numerical methods for modeling photonic-crystal VCSELs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver