TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical analysis of pore-scale CO2-EOR at near-miscible flow condition to perceive the displacement mechanism
AU - Behnoud, Parisa
AU - Khorsand Movaghar, Mohammad Reza
AU - Sabooniha, Ehsan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Gas flooding through the injection of CO2 is generally performed to achieve optimum oil recovery
from underground hydrocarbon reservoirs. However, miscible flooding, which is the most efficient
way to achieve maximum oil recovery, is not suitable for all reservoirs due to challenge in maintaining
pressure conditions. In this circumstances, a near-miscible process may be more practical. This
study focuses on pore-scale near-miscible CO2–Oil displacement, using available literature criteria to
determine the effective near-miscible region. For the first time, two separate numerical approaches
are coupled to examine the behavior of CO2–oil at the lower-pressure boundary of the specified
region. The first one, the Phase-field module, was implemented to trace the movement of fluids in the
displacement CO2–Oil process by applying the Navier–Stokes equation. Next is the TDS module which
incorporates the effect of CO2 mass transfer into the oil phase by coupling classical Fick’s law to the
fluids interface to track the variation of CO2 difusion coefficient. To better recognize the oil recovery
mechanism in pore-scale, qualitative analysis indicates that interface is moved into the by-passed
oil due to low interfacial tension in the near-miscible region. Moreover, behind the front ahead of the
main flow stream, the CO2 phase can signifcantly displace almost all the bypassed oil in normal pores
and efectively decrease the large amounts in small pores. The results show that by incorporating mass
transfer and capillary cross-flow mechanisms in the simulations, the displacement of by-passed oil in
pores can be signifcantly improved, leading to an increase in oil recovery from 92 to over 98%, which
is comparable to the result of miscible gas injection. The outcome of this research emphasizes the
significance of applying the CO2-EOR process under near-miscible operating conditions.
AB - Gas flooding through the injection of CO2 is generally performed to achieve optimum oil recovery
from underground hydrocarbon reservoirs. However, miscible flooding, which is the most efficient
way to achieve maximum oil recovery, is not suitable for all reservoirs due to challenge in maintaining
pressure conditions. In this circumstances, a near-miscible process may be more practical. This
study focuses on pore-scale near-miscible CO2–Oil displacement, using available literature criteria to
determine the effective near-miscible region. For the first time, two separate numerical approaches
are coupled to examine the behavior of CO2–oil at the lower-pressure boundary of the specified
region. The first one, the Phase-field module, was implemented to trace the movement of fluids in the
displacement CO2–Oil process by applying the Navier–Stokes equation. Next is the TDS module which
incorporates the effect of CO2 mass transfer into the oil phase by coupling classical Fick’s law to the
fluids interface to track the variation of CO2 difusion coefficient. To better recognize the oil recovery
mechanism in pore-scale, qualitative analysis indicates that interface is moved into the by-passed
oil due to low interfacial tension in the near-miscible region. Moreover, behind the front ahead of the
main flow stream, the CO2 phase can signifcantly displace almost all the bypassed oil in normal pores
and efectively decrease the large amounts in small pores. The results show that by incorporating mass
transfer and capillary cross-flow mechanisms in the simulations, the displacement of by-passed oil in
pores can be signifcantly improved, leading to an increase in oil recovery from 92 to over 98%, which
is comparable to the result of miscible gas injection. The outcome of this research emphasizes the
significance of applying the CO2-EOR process under near-miscible operating conditions.
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-023-39706-1
DO - 10.1038/s41598-023-39706-1
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37537236
AN - SCOPUS:85166588634
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 13
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 12632
ER -