Abstract
The ''no-free-lunch'' theorems (Wolpert & Macready, 1995) have sparked heated debate in the computational learning community. A recent communication (Zhu & Rohwer, 1996) attempts to demonstrate the inefficiency of cross-validation on a simple problem. We elaborate on this result by considering a broader class of cross-validation. When used more strictly, cross-validation can yield the expected results on simple examples.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Neural Computation |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 6 |
Pages (from-to) | 1246-1249 |
ISSN | 0899-7667 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1997 |