Although calibrations are routine procedures of instrumental analysis and quality assurance, the working curve is rarely applied in the determination of the uncertainty budget, most likely owing to the difficulties associated with the calculation of uncertainties. The present work provides an investigation of an uncomplicated expression of the non-linear working curve that is well suited to an assessment of predicted uncertainties. At small concentrations, the working curve reduces to a straight line that corresponds to the conventional calibration line. If no interferences were disturbing the analysis, the calculation of uncertainties of calibrations must correspond to the uncertainty of unknowns that was determined by many repetitions. Thus, by introducing an average value of the law-of-propagation of errors (LPE) and maintaining the fundamentals of statistics, as manifested by the central limit theorem, an excellent correspondence was obtained between predicted uncertainties and measured uncertainties. In order to validate the method, experiments were applied of flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) for the analysis of Co and Pt, and experiments of electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) for the analysis of Fe. A ten fold extension of the calibration range was identified, as represented by a lower limit of analysis (LLA) and an upper limit of analysis (ULA), which were defined by the properties of the detection system of the apparatus. It was thus found that the uncertainty of the detector dominates the contributions to the uncertainty budget, and it was proposed that a full analysis of the instrument ought to be performed for every single analyte before measurement. Following this investigation, the homoscedasticy or heteroscedasticy may be identified by residuals of calibration.
|Publication status||Published - 2007|
- Quality assurance
- Non-linear calibration