Abstract
Three different methods are compared for evaluating the peak values of the pier
drifts for an existing bridge model subjected to spatially varying support motions:
linear and non-linear Response History Analysis (RHA) and the Multiple Support
Response Spectrum (MSRS) method. The RHAs are performed for sets of support
motions generated with the method of conditional simulation for a prescribed
spatial variability model. In order to make consistent comparisons, the input
excitations in the MSRS analysis are described by the same spatial variability
model and the mean response spectrum of the simulated motions. The MSRS
estimates are compared with the RHA results in order to evaluate the ability of the
MSRS method to provide: (i) reliable estimates of the peak linear response and
(ii) approximate estimates of the non-linear response employing the equivalent
displacement rule.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering |
Publication date | 2010 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering : Engineering: Reaching Beyond Borders - Toronto, Canada Duration: 25 Jul 2010 → 29 Jul 2010 Conference number: 9 / 10 |
Conference
Conference | 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering : Engineering: Reaching Beyond Borders |
---|---|
Number | 9 / 10 |
Country/Territory | Canada |
City | Toronto |
Period | 25/07/2010 → 29/07/2010 |