TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuroanatomical Predictors of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)-Induced Modifications in Neurocognitive Task Performance in Typically Developing Individuals
AU - Gurr, Caroline
AU - Splittgerber, Maike
AU - Puonti, Oula
AU - Siemann, Julia
AU - Luckhardt, Christina
AU - Pereira, Helena C.
AU - Amaral, Joana
AU - Crisóstomo, Joana
AU - Sayal, Alexandre
AU - Ribeiro, Mário
AU - Sousa, Daniela
AU - Dempfle, Astrid
AU - Krauel, Kerstin
AU - Borzikowsky, Christoph
AU - Brauer, Hannah
AU - Prehn-Kristensen, Alexander
AU - Breitling-Ziegler, Carolin
AU - Castelo-Branco, Miguel
AU - Salvador, Ricardo
AU - Damiani, Giada
AU - Ruffini, Giulio
AU - Siniatchkin, Michael
AU - Thielscher, Axel
AU - Freitag, Christine M.
AU - Moliadze, Vera
AU - Ecker, Christine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 the authors.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique gaining more attention in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Due to the phenotypic heterogeneity of NDDs, tDCS is unlikely to be equally effective in all individuals. The present study aimed to establish neuroanatomical markers in typically developing (TD) individuals that may be used for the prediction of individual responses to tDCS. Fifty-seven male and female children received 2 mA anodal and sham tDCS, targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFCleft), right inferior frontal gyrus, and bilateral temporoparietal junction. Response to tDCS was assessed based on task performance differences between anodal and sham tDCS in different neurocognitive tasks (N-back, flanker, Mooney faces detection, attentional emotional recognition task). Measures of cortical thickness (CT) and surface area (SA) were derived from 3 Tesla structural MRI scans. Associations between neuroanatomy and task performance were assessed using general linear models (GLM). Machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to predict responses to tDCS. Vertex-wise estimates of SA were more closely linked to differences in task performance than measures of CT. Across ML algorithms, highest accuracies were observed for the prediction of N-back task performance differences following stimulation of the DLPFCleft, where 65% of behavioral variance was explained by variability in SA. Lower accuracies were observed for all other tasks and stimulated regions. This suggests that it may be possible to predict individual responses to tDCS for some behavioral measures and target regions. In the future, these models might be extended to predict treatment outcome in individuals with NDDs.
AB - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique gaining more attention in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Due to the phenotypic heterogeneity of NDDs, tDCS is unlikely to be equally effective in all individuals. The present study aimed to establish neuroanatomical markers in typically developing (TD) individuals that may be used for the prediction of individual responses to tDCS. Fifty-seven male and female children received 2 mA anodal and sham tDCS, targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFCleft), right inferior frontal gyrus, and bilateral temporoparietal junction. Response to tDCS was assessed based on task performance differences between anodal and sham tDCS in different neurocognitive tasks (N-back, flanker, Mooney faces detection, attentional emotional recognition task). Measures of cortical thickness (CT) and surface area (SA) were derived from 3 Tesla structural MRI scans. Associations between neuroanatomy and task performance were assessed using general linear models (GLM). Machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to predict responses to tDCS. Vertex-wise estimates of SA were more closely linked to differences in task performance than measures of CT. Across ML algorithms, highest accuracies were observed for the prediction of N-back task performance differences following stimulation of the DLPFCleft, where 65% of behavioral variance was explained by variability in SA. Lower accuracies were observed for all other tasks and stimulated regions. This suggests that it may be possible to predict individual responses to tDCS for some behavioral measures and target regions. In the future, these models might be extended to predict treatment outcome in individuals with NDDs.
KW - Cortical thickness
KW - Neuroanatomy
KW - Neurodevelopment
KW - Neuromodulation
KW - Surface area
KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1372-23.2024
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1372-23.2024
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38548336
AN - SCOPUS:85194913749
SN - 0270-6474
VL - 44
JO - Journal of neuroscience
JF - Journal of neuroscience
IS - 22
M1 - e1372232024
ER -