Modelling phosphorus (P), sulphur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions during the simulation of anaerobic digestion processes

Xavier Flores-Alsina, Kimberly Solon, Christian Kazadi-Mbamba, Stephan Tait, Krist V. Gernaey, Ulf Jeppsson, Damien Batstone

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

661 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of different model formulations when describing sludge stabilization processes in wastewater treatment plants by the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). The proposed model extensions describe the interactions amongst phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), iron (Fe) and their potential effect on total biogas production (CO2, CH4, H2 and H2S). The ADM1 version, implemented in the plant-wide context provided by the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2), is used as the basic platform (A0). Four (A1 – A4) different model extensions are implemented, simulated and evaluated. The first approach (A1) considers P transformations by accounting for the kinetic decay of polyphosphates (XPP) and potential uptake of Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA) to produce Polyhydroxyalkanoates (XPHA) by Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms (XPAO). The second model formulation (A2) describes biological production of sulfide (SH2S) by means of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria (XSRB). This approach also considers potential SH2S inhibition effect on biomass and mass transfer phenomena (aqueous-gas). The third evaluated model (A3) considers chemical iron (III) (SFe+3) reduction to iron (II) (SFe+2) using hydrogen (SH2) as the electron donor. Finally, the last evaluated approach (A4) is based on accounting for Multiple Mineral Precipitation. The ADM1 thereby switches from a 2-phase (aqueous-gas) to a 3-phase (aqueous-gas-solid) system. Simulation results show that the implementations of A1 and A2 lead to a reduction in biogas production. This reduction is attributed to two factors. Firstly, there is a fierce competition for substrate (SH2, VFA) between the existing and the new groups of microorganisms. Secondly, there is a decrease of aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis due to SH2S inhibition. Models A3 and A4 reduce the free SH2S (and consequently inhibition) plus cationic load and soluble P availability due to ion pair formation and metallic carbonate/phosphate precipitation. The final version of the manuscript will provide a deeper analysis of the different model assumptions, the effect that operational/design conditions might have on the model predictions, a detailed description of the weak acid-base chemistry and practical implications in view of plant-wide modelling/development of resource recovery strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 14th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion
Number of pages6
Publication date2015
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event14th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion - Viña del Mar, Chile
Duration: 15 Nov 201518 Nov 2015

Conference

Conference14th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion
CountryChile
City Viña del Mar
Period15/11/201518/11/2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling phosphorus (P), sulphur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions during the simulation of anaerobic digestion processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this