Model quality and safety studies

K.E. Petersen

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearch


    The paper describes the EC initiative on model quality assessment and emphasizes some of the problems encountered in the selection of data from field tests used in the evaluation process. Further, it discusses the impact of model uncertainties in safety studies of industrial plants. The model evaluation group (MEG) is a European initiative on evaluation of technical models used within the major industrial hazard area and is supported by the EC DGXII, Directorate-General for Science, Research and Development. Closely related to MEG is REDIPHEM, which is the acronym of a research project supported by the EC Environment Research Programme focusing on assessment of the quality of experimental data and models for dense gas dispersion created within the EC funded research programmes. Technical models are used in a number of areas of industrial hazards assessment. It is becoming more and more apparent that most of these have never been through a procedure of evaluation, but nonetheless are used to assist in making decisions that may directly affect the safety of the public and the environment. As a major funder of European research on major industrial hazards, DGXII is conscious of the importance of ensuring that model development is of a standard that is commensurate with the importance of model use.

    The aim of MEG is to improve the culture in which models are developed and used and so ensure that technical models used in all aspects of major hazard evaluation are up to date with technical developments and used by personnel well versed in their applicability and functioning.

    In 1994, MEG finalized a generic protocol for model evaluation and guidelines for model developers. The two documents prepared by MEG have been through a preliminary review by 10-20 experts and will be further developed based on the experience obtained in the working groups. MEG has so far initiated three working groups on specific subject areas: dense gas dispersion, liquefied pool fires and vapour cloud explosions.

    This paper describes the model evaluation protocol intended for users who wish to assess if a cel-tain model is appropriate for use in solving a given problem. Further, the findings from the REDIPHEM project related to dense gas dispersion will be highlighted. Finally, the paper will discuss the need for model quality assessment in safety studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Environment and Pollution
    Issue number3-6
    Pages (from-to)333-337
    Publication statusPublished - 1997
    Event4th Workshop on Harmonization with Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes - Oostende, Belgium
    Duration: 6 May 19969 May 1996
    Conference number: 4


    Conference4th Workshop on Harmonization with Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes


    • Model evaluation
    • REDIPHEM project
    • Safety studies


    Dive into the research topics of 'Model quality and safety studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this