Abstract
Human-automation interaction in complex systems is common, yet design for this interaction is often conducted without explicit consideration of the role of the human operator. Fortunately, there are a number of modeling frameworks proposed for supporting this design activity. However, the frameworks are often adapted from other purposes, usually applied to a limited range of problems, sometimes not fully described in the open literature, and rarely critically reviewed in a manner acceptable to proponents and critics alike. The present paper introduces a panel session wherein these proponents (and reportedly one or two critics) can engage one another on several agreed questions about such frameworks. The goal is to aid non-aligned practitioners in choosing between alternative frameworks for their human-automation interaction design challenges.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ASME ESDA 2012) |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) |
| Publication date | 2012 |
| Chapter | ESDA2012-82892 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| Event | 11th ASME Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis - Nantes International Convention Centre, Nantes, France Duration: 2 Jul 2012 → 4 Jul 2012 Conference number: 11 |
Conference
| Conference | 11th ASME Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis |
|---|---|
| Number | 11 |
| Location | Nantes International Convention Centre |
| Country/Territory | France |
| City | Nantes |
| Period | 02/07/2012 → 04/07/2012 |