Abstract
We prove that PG(2, 8) does not contain minimal blocking sets of size 14. Using this result we prove that 58 is the largest size for a maximal partial spread of PG(3, 8). This supports the conjecture that q2-q+ 2 is the largest size for a maximal partial spread of PG(3, q), q>7.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Designs, Codes and Cryptography |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 15-26 |
| ISSN | 0925-1022 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Minimal Blocking Sets in PG(2, 8) and Maximal Partial Spreads in PG(3, 8)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver