TY - JOUR
T1 - Micro-scale model comparison (benchmark) at the moderately complex forested site Ryningsnäs
AU - Ivanell, Stefan
AU - Arnqvist, Johan
AU - Avila, Matias
AU - Cavar, Dalibor
AU - Chavez-Arroyo, Roberto Aurelio
AU - Olivares-Espinosa, Hugo
AU - Peralta, Carlos
AU - Adib, Jamal
AU - Witha, Björn
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - This article describes a study in which modellers were challenged to
compute the wind field at a forested site with moderately complex
topography. The task was to model the wind field in stationary conditions
with neutral stratification by using the wind velocity measured at 100 m at
a metmast as the only reference. Detailed maps of terrain elevation and forest
densities were provided as the only inputs, derived from airborne laser scans
(ALSs) with a resolution of 10 m × 10 m covering an area of
50 km × 50 km, that closely match the actual forest and
elevation of the site. The participants were free to apply their best
practices for the simulation to decide the size of the domain, the
value of the geostrophic wind, and every other modelling parameter. The
comparison of the results with the measurements is shown for the vertical
profiles of wind speed, shear, wind direction, and turbulent kinetic energy.
The ALS-based data resulted in reasonable agreement of the wind profile and
turbulence magnitude. The best performance was found to be that of large-eddy
simulations using a very large domain. For the Reynolds-averaged
Navier–Stokes type of models, the constants in the turbulence closure were
shown to have a great influence on the yielded turbulence level, but were of
much less importance for the wind speed profile. Of the variety of closure
constants used by the participating modellers, the closure constants from
Sogachev and Panferov (2006) proved to agree best with the measurements.
Particularly the use of Cμ≈0.03 in the k–ε model
obtained better agreement with turbulence level measurements. All except two
participating models used the full detailed ground and forest information to
model the forest, which is considered significant progress compared to
previous conventional approaches. Overall, the article gives an overview of
how well different types of models are able to capture the flow physics at a
moderately complex forested site.
AB - This article describes a study in which modellers were challenged to
compute the wind field at a forested site with moderately complex
topography. The task was to model the wind field in stationary conditions
with neutral stratification by using the wind velocity measured at 100 m at
a metmast as the only reference. Detailed maps of terrain elevation and forest
densities were provided as the only inputs, derived from airborne laser scans
(ALSs) with a resolution of 10 m × 10 m covering an area of
50 km × 50 km, that closely match the actual forest and
elevation of the site. The participants were free to apply their best
practices for the simulation to decide the size of the domain, the
value of the geostrophic wind, and every other modelling parameter. The
comparison of the results with the measurements is shown for the vertical
profiles of wind speed, shear, wind direction, and turbulent kinetic energy.
The ALS-based data resulted in reasonable agreement of the wind profile and
turbulence magnitude. The best performance was found to be that of large-eddy
simulations using a very large domain. For the Reynolds-averaged
Navier–Stokes type of models, the constants in the turbulence closure were
shown to have a great influence on the yielded turbulence level, but were of
much less importance for the wind speed profile. Of the variety of closure
constants used by the participating modellers, the closure constants from
Sogachev and Panferov (2006) proved to agree best with the measurements.
Particularly the use of Cμ≈0.03 in the k–ε model
obtained better agreement with turbulence level measurements. All except two
participating models used the full detailed ground and forest information to
model the forest, which is considered significant progress compared to
previous conventional approaches. Overall, the article gives an overview of
how well different types of models are able to capture the flow physics at a
moderately complex forested site.
KW - Renewable energy sources
KW - TJ807-830
U2 - 10.5194/wes-3-929-2018
DO - 10.5194/wes-3-929-2018
M3 - Journal article
VL - 3
SP - 929
EP - 946
JO - Wind Energy Science
JF - Wind Energy Science
SN - 2366-7443
IS - 2
ER -