Methodology to address potential impacts of plastic emissions in life cycle assessment

Daniel Maga*, Christina Galafton, Jan Bloemer, Nils Thonemann, Aybueke Oezdamar, Juergen Bertling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

174 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Products made of plastic often appear to have lower environmental impacts than alternatives. However, present life cycle assessments (LCA) do not consider possible risks caused by the emission of plastics into the environment. Following the precautionary principle, we propose characterization factors (CFs) for plastic emissions allowing to calculate impacts of plastic pollution measured in plastic pollution equivalents, based on plastics' residence time in the environment.
Methods and materials: The method addresses the definition and quantification of plastic emissions in LCA and estimates their fate in the environment based on their persistence. According to our approach, the fate is mainly influenced by the environmental compartment the plastic is initially emitted to, its redistribution to other compartments, and its degradation speed. The latter depends on the polymer type's specific surface degradation rate (SSDR), the emission's shape, and its characteristic length. The SSDRs are derived from an extensive literature review. Since the data quality of the SSDR and redistribution rates varies, an uncertainty assessment is carried out based on the pedigree matrix approach. To quantify the fate factor (FF), we calculate the area below the degradation curve of an emission and call it residence time ΤR.
Results and discussion: The results of our research include degradation measurements (SSDRs) retrieved from literature, a surface-driven degradation model, redistribution patterns, FFs based on the residence time, and an uncertainty analysis of the suggested FFs. Depending on the applied time horizon, the values of the FFs range from near zero to values greater than 1000 for different polymer types, size classes, shapes, and initial compartments. Based on the comparison of the compartment-specific FFs with the total compartment-weighted FFs, the polymer types can be grouped into six clusters. The proposed FFs can be used as CFs which can be further developed by integrating the probability of the exposure of humans or organisms to the plastic emission (exposure factor) and for the impacts of plastics on species (effect factor).
Conclusions: The proposed methodology is intended to support (plastic) product designers, for example, regarding materials' choice, and can serve as a first proxy to estimate potential risks caused by plastic emissions. Besides, the FFs can be used to develop new CFs, which can be linked to one or more existing impact categories, such as human toxicity or ecotoxicity, or new impact categories addressing, for example, potential risks caused by entanglement.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume27
Pages (from-to)469-491
Number of pages23
ISSN0948-3349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Degradation
  • Plastics
  • LCIA
  • SSDR
  • Fate
  • Impact
  • Plastic emissions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodology to address potential impacts of plastic emissions in life cycle assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this