TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement Uncertainty and Risk of False Compliance Assessment Applied to Carbon Isotopic Analyses in Natural Gas Exploratory Evaluation
AU - Leal, Fabiano Galdino
AU - de Andrade Ferreira, Alexandre
AU - Silva, Gabriel Moraes
AU - Freire, Tulio Alves
AU - Costa, Marcelo Ribeiro
AU - de Morais, Erica Tavares
AU - Guzzo, Jarbas Vicente Poley
AU - de Oliveira, Elcio Cruz
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The concept of uncertainty in an isotopic analysis is not uniform in the
scientific community worldwide and can compromise the risk of false
compliance assessment applied to carbon isotopic analyses in natural gas
exploratory evaluation. In this work, we demonstrated a way to
calculate one of the main sources of this uncertainty, which is
underestimated in most studies focusing on gas analysis: the δ13C
calculation itself is primarily based on the raw analytical data. The
carbon isotopic composition of methane, ethane, propane, and CO2
was measured. After a detailed mathematical treatment, the
corresponding expanded uncertainties for each analyte were calculated.
Next, for the systematic isotopic characterization of the two gas
standards, we calculated the standard uncertainty, intermediary
precision, combined standard uncertainty, and finally, the expanded
uncertainty for methane, ethane, propane, and CO2. We have
found an expanded uncertainty value of 1.8‰ for all compounds, except
for propane, where a value of 1.6‰ was obtained. The expanded
uncertainty values calculated with the approach shown in this study
reveal that the error arising from the application of delta calculation
algorithms cannot be neglected, and the obtained values are higher than
0.5‰, usually considered as the accepted uncertainty associated with the
GC-IRMS analyses. Finally, based on the use of uncertainty information
to evaluate the risk of false compliance, the lower and upper acceptance
limits for the carbon isotopic analysis of methane in natural gas are
calculated, considering the exploratory limits between −55‰ and −50‰:
(i) for the underestimated current uncertainty of 0.5‰, the lower and
upper acceptance limits, respectively, are −54.6‰ and −50.4‰; and (ii)
for the proposed realistic uncertainty of 1.8‰, the lower and upper
acceptance limits would be more restrictive; i.e., −53.5‰ and −51.5‰,
respectively.
AB - The concept of uncertainty in an isotopic analysis is not uniform in the
scientific community worldwide and can compromise the risk of false
compliance assessment applied to carbon isotopic analyses in natural gas
exploratory evaluation. In this work, we demonstrated a way to
calculate one of the main sources of this uncertainty, which is
underestimated in most studies focusing on gas analysis: the δ13C
calculation itself is primarily based on the raw analytical data. The
carbon isotopic composition of methane, ethane, propane, and CO2
was measured. After a detailed mathematical treatment, the
corresponding expanded uncertainties for each analyte were calculated.
Next, for the systematic isotopic characterization of the two gas
standards, we calculated the standard uncertainty, intermediary
precision, combined standard uncertainty, and finally, the expanded
uncertainty for methane, ethane, propane, and CO2. We have
found an expanded uncertainty value of 1.8‰ for all compounds, except
for propane, where a value of 1.6‰ was obtained. The expanded
uncertainty values calculated with the approach shown in this study
reveal that the error arising from the application of delta calculation
algorithms cannot be neglected, and the obtained values are higher than
0.5‰, usually considered as the accepted uncertainty associated with the
GC-IRMS analyses. Finally, based on the use of uncertainty information
to evaluate the risk of false compliance, the lower and upper acceptance
limits for the carbon isotopic analysis of methane in natural gas are
calculated, considering the exploratory limits between −55‰ and −50‰:
(i) for the underestimated current uncertainty of 0.5‰, the lower and
upper acceptance limits, respectively, are −54.6‰ and −50.4‰; and (ii)
for the proposed realistic uncertainty of 1.8‰, the lower and upper
acceptance limits would be more restrictive; i.e., −53.5‰ and −51.5‰,
respectively.
KW - Biogenic isotopic composition
KW - Gas geochemistry
KW - Measurement uncertainty
KW - Natural gas exploratory evaluation
KW - Stable isotope analysis
U2 - 10.3390/molecules29133065
DO - 10.3390/molecules29133065
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38999016
SN - 1420-3049
VL - 29
JO - Molecules
JF - Molecules
IS - 13
M1 - 3065
ER -