TY - JOUR
T1 - Material flow analysis of alternative biorefinery systems for managing Chinese food waste
AU - Guo, Hanwen
AU - Zhao, Yan
AU - Damgaard, Anders
AU - Wang, Qian
AU - Lu, Wenjing
AU - Wang, Hongtao
AU - Christensen, Thomas Højlund
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Consistent material and substance flow diagrams for five alternative biorefinery scenarios for treating Chinese food waste were obtained by combining reported experimental research data and material flow analysis. The biorefinery alternatives produced biogas, biomethane, bioethanol and biodiesel in various combinations. The compiled statistical data compiled showed that 100 t of Chinese food waste could produce 16 ± 1.1 t of biogas as a single technology and that other advanced biorefinery concepts could produce 5 ± 0.4 t of biomethane, 4 ± 1.6 t of bioethanol and/or 3 ± 0.2 t of biodiesel. In terms of substance flow, biorefinery scenarios transfer up to 75% of the total initial carbon in the food waste into bioproducts, while 22% of carbon is emitted, primarily as carbon dioxide. The compost obtained by composting the dewatered digestate contained about 75% of input P, 27% of input K and 6% of input N. About 15% of input N was lost to the air during composting. The remaining C, N, P and K were in the wastewater. Introducing biorefinery concepts to the management of Chinese food waste can facilitate the generation of high-value bioproducts. However, biorefinery concepts are technologically complicated and the energy consumption may triple relative to that of only biogas production. The issue of a considerably large liquid fraction in all cases still needs to be addressed. The material flow diagrams in this work constitute a consistent platform for assessing future scenarios for treating Chinese food waste from a technical, economical as well environmental perspective.
AB - Consistent material and substance flow diagrams for five alternative biorefinery scenarios for treating Chinese food waste were obtained by combining reported experimental research data and material flow analysis. The biorefinery alternatives produced biogas, biomethane, bioethanol and biodiesel in various combinations. The compiled statistical data compiled showed that 100 t of Chinese food waste could produce 16 ± 1.1 t of biogas as a single technology and that other advanced biorefinery concepts could produce 5 ± 0.4 t of biomethane, 4 ± 1.6 t of bioethanol and/or 3 ± 0.2 t of biodiesel. In terms of substance flow, biorefinery scenarios transfer up to 75% of the total initial carbon in the food waste into bioproducts, while 22% of carbon is emitted, primarily as carbon dioxide. The compost obtained by composting the dewatered digestate contained about 75% of input P, 27% of input K and 6% of input N. About 15% of input N was lost to the air during composting. The remaining C, N, P and K were in the wastewater. Introducing biorefinery concepts to the management of Chinese food waste can facilitate the generation of high-value bioproducts. However, biorefinery concepts are technologically complicated and the energy consumption may triple relative to that of only biogas production. The issue of a considerably large liquid fraction in all cases still needs to be addressed. The material flow diagrams in this work constitute a consistent platform for assessing future scenarios for treating Chinese food waste from a technical, economical as well environmental perspective.
KW - Food waste
KW - Biorefinery
KW - Material flow analysis
KW - Substance flow analysis
KW - Scenario inventory
U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.010
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0921-3449
VL - 149
SP - 197
EP - 209
JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
ER -