Marshaling ports required to meet US policy targets for offshore wind power

Sara B. Parkison*, Willett Kempton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We analyze infrastructure needed for offshore wind power targets set by U.S. state and federal policies—specifically, manufacturing, vessels, and offshore wind ports. By examining cost-competitive turbine and project sizes and infrastructure challenges, we identify marshaling ports as a key bottleneck. Through elicitation of requirements from supply chain, port, and vessel experts, we identify the necessary attributes for marshaling ports and calculate the area needed to meet policy targets. US marshaling ports are currently insufficient to meet either state or federal power targets. We calculate state commitments from state contracts and policies: in sum, 40 GW by 2040. Federal targets from the Biden Administration are 30 GW by 2030 and 110 GW by 2050. Either target yields more demand for marshaling area than is currently available or planned. The shortage of marshaling area supply has incorrectly been attributed to lack of suitable U.S. locations. Instead, we attribute it to developers having built ports to support early, smaller projects, and having located them to incentivize state power contracts rather than developing ports for long-term, large-scale, and economically-efficient use. Additional land suitable for marshaling ports exists, but it requires commitment from port authorities and port investors to develop it for this purpose.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112817
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume163
Number of pages15
ISSN0301-4215
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Energy supply chain
  • Marine construction
  • Maritime logistics
  • Marshaling ports
  • Offshore wind power
  • Ports

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marshaling ports required to meet US policy targets for offshore wind power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this