Marginal abatement cost of alternative marine fuels and the role of market-based measures

Sotiria Lagouvardou*, Benjamin Lagemann, Harilaos N. Psaraftis, Elizabeth Lindstad, Stein Ove Erikstad

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

167 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Uncertainties on the global availability and affordability of alternative marine fuels are stalling the shipping sector’s decarbonization course. Several candidate measures are being discussed at the International Maritime Organization, including market-based measures (MBMs) and environmental policies such as carbon taxes and emissions trading systems, as means to decarbonize. Their implementation increases the cost of fossil fuel consumption and provides fiscal incentives to shipping stakeholders to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions reductions. MBMs can bridge the price gap between alternative and conventional fuels and generate revenues for funding the up-scaling of alternative fuels’ production, storage and distribution facilities and, thus, enhance their availability. By estimating the fuels’ implementation and operational costs and carbon abatement potential, this study calculates marginal abatement costs and estimates the level of carbon pricing needed to render investments into alternative fuels cost-effective. The results can assist policymakers in establishing robust and effective maritime decarbonization policies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Energy
Volume8
Pages (from-to)1209–1220
ISSN2058-7546
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marginal abatement cost of alternative marine fuels and the role of market-based measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this