Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Machine and deep learning in REM sleep behavior disorder: a scoping review and analysis of reporting quality

  • Andreas Brink-Kjaer
  • , Irene Rechichi
  • , Dario Arnaldi
  • , Olivia Cesarone
  • , Emmanuel During
  • , Simon Feuerstein
  • , Katarina M. Gunter
  • , Birgit Högl
  • , Abubaker Ibrahim
  • , Poul Jennum
  • , Emmanuel Mignot
  • , Gabriella Olmo
  • , Monica Roascio
  • , Ambra Stefani
  • , Qi Tang
  • , Matteo Cesari*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Polytechnic University of Turin
  • University of Genoa
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Innsbruck Medical University
  • University of Oxford
  • Stanford University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › peer-review

36 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia, and its isolated form is of particular interest, as it is an early phase alpha-synucleinopathy. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models offer potential for automated detection, prediction of phenoconversion, and phenotyping. This scoping review identified 75 studies applying ML/DL in RBD and evaluated their methodological and reporting quality using the APPRAISE-AI tool. Most studies (73.3%) focused on RBD detection and mainly used polysomnographic data for this, while 16% addressed prediction of phenoconversion, with imaging data being the most employed modality. Sample sizes were generally small (most studies including only 20–100 individuals). According to APPRAISE-AI scores, 80% of studies had moderate overall methodological and reporting quality. Common deficiencies included lack of transparency in data and code sharing (23.3%), and poor reporting of hyperparameter tuning (17.1%), bias assessment (26.9%), and error analysis (0.66%). Data leakage was observed in 32% of studies. These issues hinder clinical translation and prevent incremental progress between research groups. Without transparent reporting and shared resources, replication and model comparisons become nearly impossible. Future work should adopt open science principles and rigorous validation to advance AI-based tools in sleep medicine.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102299
JournalSleep Medicine Reviews
Volume88
Number of pages15
ISSN1087-0792
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • AI
  • Artificial intelligence
  • DL
  • ML
  • RBD
  • Reporting quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine and deep learning in REM sleep behavior disorder: a scoping review and analysis of reporting quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this