Abstract
Environmental microplastics research has expanded rapidly over the past two decades. Although the presence of microplastics in the ocean were first described more than 50 years ago, consistent scientific, public, and regulatory attention has emerged only in the last 15-20 years. Since then, publication output has grown almost exponentially, reaching a point where the volume of literature exceeds the community's capacity to effectively track, synthesize, and mobilize new information into actionable knowledge. In this Perspective, we describe what we term the publication deluge: a state in which continued accumulation of studies generates information overload and fog rather than clarity. We argue that this situation comes with a risk of blurring established understanding, reopening debate around facts with established consensus, and delaying progress toward prioritization and long-term solutions. Using a conceptual framework that distinguishes between problem stabilization, refinement, and solution-oriented understanding, we discuss structural drivers of this lock-in and outline concrete actions that authors, editors, publishers, institutions, and funders can take to push the field toward more synthetic, integrative, and actionable knowledge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Environmental Science & Technology |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 23 |
| Pages (from-to) | 16402-16409 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISSN | 0013-936X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
Keywords
- Plastic pollution
- Information overload
- Overpublication
- Evidence synthesis
- Study quality
- Incentive structures
- Agenda setting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lost in a Sea of Information: The Microplastics Publication Deluge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver