Long-term sampling of CO2 from waste-to-energy plants: 14C determination methodology, data variation and uncertainty

Karsten Fuglsang, Niels Hald Pedersen, Anna Warberg Larsen, Thomas Fruergaard Astrup

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    A dedicated sampling and measurement method was developed for long-term measurements of biogenic and fossil-derived CO2 from thermal waste-to-energy processes. Based on long-term sampling of CO2 and 14C determination, plant-specific emission factors can be determined more accurately, and the annual emission of fossil CO2 from waste-to-energy plants can be monitored according to carbon trading schemes and renewable energy certificates. Weekly and monthly measurements were performed at five Danish waste incinerators. Significant variations between fractions of biogenic CO2 emitted were observed, not only over time, but also between plants. From the results of monthly samples at one plant, the annual mean fraction of biogenic CO2 was found to be 69% of the total annual CO2 emissions. From weekly samples, taken every 3 months at the five plants, significant seasonal variations in biogenic CO2 emissions were observed (between 56% and 71% biogenic CO2). These variations confirmed that biomass fractions in the waste can vary considerably, not only from day to day but also from month to month. An uncertainty budget for the measurement method itself showed that the expanded uncertainty of the method was ± 4.0 pmC (95 % confidence interval) at 62 pmC. The long-term sampling method was found to be useful for waste incinerators for determination of annual fossil and biogenic CO2 emissions with relatively low uncertainty.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalWaste Management and Research
    Volume32
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)115-123
    ISSN0734-242X
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term sampling of CO2 from waste-to-energy plants: 14C determination methodology, data variation and uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this