Long-term exposure to wind turbine noise at night and risk for diabetes: A nationwide cohort study

Aslak Harbo Poulsen*, Ole Raaschou-Nielsen, Alfredo Pena Diaz, Andrea N. Hahmann, Rikke Baastrup Nordsborg, Matthias Ketzel, Jørgen Brandt, Mette Sørensen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


    Focus on renewable energy sources and reduced unit costs has led to increased number of wind turbines (WTs). WT noise (WTN) is reported to be highly annoying at levels from 30 to 35 dB and up, whereas for traffic noise people report to be highly annoyed from 40 to 45 dB and up. This has raised concerns as to whether WTN may increase risk for major diseases, as exposure to traffic noise has consistently been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. We identified all Danish dwellings within a radius of 20 WT heights and 25% of all dwellings within 20-40 WT heights from a WT. Using detailed data on WT type and hourly wind data at each WT position and height, we estimated hourly outdoor and low frequency indoor WTN for all dwellings, aggregated as nighttime 1- and 5-year running means. Using nationwide registries, we identified a study population of 614,731 persons living in these dwellings in the period from 1996 to 2012, of whom 25,148 developed diabetes. Data were analysed using Poisson regression with adjustment for individual and area-levels covariates. We found no associations between long-term exposure to WTN during night and diabetes risk, with incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 0.90 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.79-1.02) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.68-1.24) for 5-year mean nighttime outdoor WTN of 36-42 and ≥ 42 dB, respectively, compared to
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEnvironmental Research
    Pages (from-to)40-45
    Publication statusPublished - 2018


    • Diabetes
    • Epidemiology
    • Wind turbine noise


    Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term exposure to wind turbine noise at night and risk for diabetes: A nationwide cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this