TY - JOUR
T1 - Life cycle assessment of H2O electrolysis technologies
AU - Zhao, Guangling
AU - Kraglund, Mikkel Rykær
AU - Frandsen, Henrik Lund
AU - Wulff, Anders Christian
AU - Jensen, Søren Højgaard
AU - Chen, Ming
AU - Graves, Christopher R.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Hydrogen produced from H2O electrolysis works as an energy carrier and helps to overcome the challenges of intermittent renewable energy sources. At present, no comprehensive environmental impact assessment is available for three commercially H2O electrolysis technologies, namely solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC), polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis cell (PEMEC), and alkaline electrolysis cell (AEC). The study aimed to provide potential environmental impacts of the electrolysis technologies based on life cycle assessment. Among the investigated 16 impact categories, the stage of critical material use of three H2O electrolysis stacks was identified as the hotspot of environmental impacts. The critical materials were stainless steel and nickel from SOEC, platinum and iridium from PEMEC, and nickel from AEC. Life cycle impact results from PEMEC stack were much higher than these from SOEC and AEC stacks, while electricity played a more important role in the life cycle impact of hydrogen production. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the most effective approach to reducing potential impacts would be to reduce critical materials use on the current status of electrolysis technologies.
AB - Hydrogen produced from H2O electrolysis works as an energy carrier and helps to overcome the challenges of intermittent renewable energy sources. At present, no comprehensive environmental impact assessment is available for three commercially H2O electrolysis technologies, namely solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC), polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis cell (PEMEC), and alkaline electrolysis cell (AEC). The study aimed to provide potential environmental impacts of the electrolysis technologies based on life cycle assessment. Among the investigated 16 impact categories, the stage of critical material use of three H2O electrolysis stacks was identified as the hotspot of environmental impacts. The critical materials were stainless steel and nickel from SOEC, platinum and iridium from PEMEC, and nickel from AEC. Life cycle impact results from PEMEC stack were much higher than these from SOEC and AEC stacks, while electricity played a more important role in the life cycle impact of hydrogen production. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the most effective approach to reducing potential impacts would be to reduce critical materials use on the current status of electrolysis technologies.
KW - AEC electrolysis
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - PEMEC electrolysis
KW - SOEC electrolysis
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.282
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.282
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85088945864
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 45
SP - 23765
EP - 23781
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
IS - 43
ER -