Abstract
Are some ways of measuring scientific quality better than others? We analyze the reliability and precision of commonly-used methods for ranking scientific citation records. We demonstrate that the inaccuracy of several widely-used measures of quality renders them unsuitable for practical use.
| Original language | Danish |
|---|---|
| Journal | Ugeskrift for Laeger |
| Volume | 169 |
| Issue number | 38 |
| Pages (from-to) | 3205-3207 |
| ISSN | 0041-5782 |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |