TY - GEN
T1 - Knowledge Graphs for Empirical Concept Retrieval
AU - Tětková, Lenka
AU - Scheidt, Teresa Karen
AU - Fogh, Maria Mandrup
AU - Jørgensen, Ellen Marie Gaunby
AU - Nielsen, Finn Årup
AU - Hansen, Lars Kai
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Concept-based explainable AI is promising as a tool to improve the understanding of complex models at the premises of a given user, viz. as a tool for personalized explainability. An important class of concept-based explainability methods is constructed with empirically defined concepts, indirectly defined through a set of positive and negative examples, as in the TCAV approach. While it is appealing to the user to avoid formal definitions of concepts and their operationalization, it can be challenging to establish relevant concept datasets. Here, we address this challenge using general knowledge graphs (such as, e.g., Wikidata or WordNet) for comprehensive concept definition and present a workflow for user-driven data collection in both text and image domains. The concepts derived from knowledge graphs are defined interactively, providing an opportunity for personalization and ensuring that the concepts reflect the user’s intentions. We test the retrieved concept datasets on two concept-based explainability methods, namely concept activation vectors (CAVs) and concept activation regions (CARs). We show that CAVs and CARs based on these empirical concept datasets provide robust and accurate explanations. Importantly, we also find good alignment between the models’ representations of concepts and the structure of knowledge graphs, i.e., human representations. This supports our conclusion that knowledge graph-based concepts are relevant for XAI.
AB - Concept-based explainable AI is promising as a tool to improve the understanding of complex models at the premises of a given user, viz. as a tool for personalized explainability. An important class of concept-based explainability methods is constructed with empirically defined concepts, indirectly defined through a set of positive and negative examples, as in the TCAV approach. While it is appealing to the user to avoid formal definitions of concepts and their operationalization, it can be challenging to establish relevant concept datasets. Here, we address this challenge using general knowledge graphs (such as, e.g., Wikidata or WordNet) for comprehensive concept definition and present a workflow for user-driven data collection in both text and image domains. The concepts derived from knowledge graphs are defined interactively, providing an opportunity for personalization and ensuring that the concepts reflect the user’s intentions. We test the retrieved concept datasets on two concept-based explainability methods, namely concept activation vectors (CAVs) and concept activation regions (CARs). We show that CAVs and CARs based on these empirical concept datasets provide robust and accurate explanations. Importantly, we also find good alignment between the models’ representations of concepts and the structure of knowledge graphs, i.e., human representations. This supports our conclusion that knowledge graph-based concepts are relevant for XAI.
KW - Concept-based Explainability
KW - Concepts
KW - Knowledge Graphs
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-63787-2_9
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-63787-2_9
M3 - Article in proceedings
SN - 978-3-031-63786-5
VL - 2153
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 160
EP - 183
BT - Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Explainable Artificial Intelligence
PB - Springer
T2 - Second World Conference on eXplainable Artificial Intelligence
Y2 - 17 July 2024 through 19 July 2024
ER -