Abstract
The consequences of high-end climate scenarios and the risks of extreme events
involve a number of critical assumptions and methodological challenges related to key uncertainties
in climate scenarios and modelling, impact analysis, and economics. A methodological framework
for integrated analysis of extreme events and damage costs is developed and applied to a
case study of urban flooding for the medium sized Danish city of Odense. Moving from our current
climate to higher atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations including a 2°, 4°, and a
high-end 6°C scenario implies that the frequency of extreme events increase beyond scaling, and
in combination with economic assumptions we find a very wide range of risk estimates for urban
precipitation events. A sensitivity analysis addresses 32 combinations of climate scenarios, damage
cost curve approaches, and economic assumptions, including risk aversion and equity represented
by discount rates. Major impacts of alternative assumptions are investigated. As a result,
this study demonstrates that in terms of decision making the actual expectations concerning
future climate scenarios and the economic assumptions applied are very important in determining
the risks of extreme climate events and, thereby, of the level of cost-effective adaptation seen from
the society’s point of view.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Climate Research |
Volume | 64 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 85-98 |
ISSN | 0936-577X |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Climate scenarios
- Extremes
- Risks
- Damage and welfare costs
- Uncertainties