Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working Group on Eels (WGEEL)

  • Andreas Bryhn
  • , Argyris Sapoundis
  • , Arvydas Svagzdys
  • , Ayesha Taylor
  • , Azza El Ganainy
  • , Carlos Fernández-Delgado
  • , Caroline Durif
  • , Cédric Briand
  • , Chiara Leone
  • , Ciara O’Leary
  • , Clarisse Boulenger
  • , Claude Belpaire
  • , Derek Evans
  • , Edmond Hala
  • , Erini Papnikolaou
  • , Eleonora Ciccotti
  • , Elisabetta Betulla Morello
  • , Elsa Amilhat
  • , Emna Deriouiche
  • , Estibaliz Diaz
  • Eva Thorstad, Fateh Chebel, Feargahil Armstrong, Hilaire Drouineau, Inigo Martinez, Irene Prisco, Isabel Domingos, Jan-Dag Pohlmann*, Janek Simon, Jânis Bajinskis, Jason Godfrey, Josefin Sundin, Jouni Tulonen, Karin Camara, Katarzyna Janiak, Kenzo Kaifu, Lamia Bendjedid, Lasse Marohn, Laurent Beaulaton, Linas Lozys, Marco Kule, Marko Freese, Marouene Bdioui, Matthew Gollock, Mercedes Herrera Arroyo, Michael Ingemann Pedersen, Noemie Regli, Nurbanu Partal, Priit Bernotas, Rachid Toujani, Reinhold Hanel, Rob van Gemert, Robert Rosell, Russell Poole, Sami Vesala, Samir Rouidi, Sukran Yalcin Ozdilek, Tamer Bitar, Tea Basic, Tessa van der Hammen, Tomas Didrikas, Tomas Zolubas, Tomasz Nermer, Willem Dekker
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • Centre for the Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
  • Institute of Food Safety Animal Health and Environment
  • National Institute of Sciences and Technologies of the Sea
  • French Agency for Biodiversity
  • Le Centre National de Recherche et de Développement de la Pêche et de l'Aquaculture
  • National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries
  • EPTB Vilaine
  • Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania
  • AZTI
  • University of Lisbon
  • INRAE
  • Institute of Marine Research
  • University of Córdoba
  • Agricultural University of Tirana
  • Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute
  • The European Commission's Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
  • Chuo University
  • The State Scientific Research Institute Nature Research Centre
  • Inland Fisheries Ireland
  • Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
  • Hellenic Fisheries Research Institute
  • Université de Perpignan
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • Luke Natural Resources Institute Finland
  • Klaipėda University
  • Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute
  • Office francais de la biodiversité
  • Marine Institute
  • Environment Agency
  • Marine Scotland Science
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Research Institute for Nature and Forest
  • North Rhine Westfalian State Agency for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection
  • Fisheries Research Institute
  • University of Perpignan
  • International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
  • Institute of Inland Fisheries in Potsdam-Sacrow
  • Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
  • Estonian University of Life Sciences
  • Natural Resources Institute Finland
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • National Marine Fisheries Research Institute

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

267 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

The Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working group on eels (WGEEL) met by correspondence and video conference from September 7 – 10 September and 27 September – 4 October in 2021 to assess the state of the European eel and its fisheries, investigate the effects of contaminants on the reproductive capacity of the eel stock, discuss the findings of WKFEA, further identify issues specific to the Mediterranean region and report on any updates to the scientific basis of the advice, new and emerging threats or opportunities.

For a better integration of the Mediterranean area, new members joined WGEEL, providing data and support as regional experts. This is considered an important step in a continuous process to identify and address Mediterranean-specific issues and harmonize the efforts of WGEEL and the recent ‘GFCM research Programme on European Eel’.

The recruitment of European eel strongly declined from 1980 to 2011. The glass eel recruitment compared to that in 1960–1979 in the “North Sea” index area was 0.6% in 2021 (provisional) and 0.9 % in 2020 (final). In the “Elsewhere Europe” index series it was 5.4 % in 2021 (provisional) and 7.1% in 2020 (final), based on available dataseries. For the yellow eel dataseries, recruitment for 2020 was 16% (final) of the 1960–1979 level; the 2021data collection for yellow eel is ongoing. Time-series from 1980 to 2021 show that recruitment has stopped decreasing in 2011 but the trend thereafter is rather unclear.

Preliminary analyses of 160 dataseries on yellow or silver eel abundance show the potential of the yellow and silver eels’ series to improve the stock assessment. A comprehensive framework of analyses of the yellow and silver stocks through these series will, however, require many iterations of data collection, analyses and further data needs.

Mortality and biomass indicators have been reviewed and visualized, preparing for a future workshop on the evaluation of eel management plans (WKEMP). Spatial overviews and temporal trends show a lack of data for many regions and no evidence yet of a general improvement in stock status for regions with data. Overall silver eel escapement remains low and mortalities high. Doubts remain about the consistency of indicators across countries. The information provided on data and methods used for assessment are not available or sufficiently detailed to ensure transparency and reproducibility of estimates. These limitations and the incomplete reporting impair the use of these data to inform on the status of the stock at a larger scale.

A review on the effects of contaminants (in a broader sense: spawner quality) on the reproductive capacity of eel highlighted this as an important, but a frequently lacking, aspect of stock assessment. Monitoring of silver eel quality should be considered as part of new or existing programmes.

WGEEL supports the findings WKFEA and the suggested roadmap and agreed to implement the necessary steps towards achieving it. This implies further exploration and analyses of existing as well as the systematic collection of additional data. Implementation will require concerted data collection and assessment, which will require additional support.

In summary, the working group has focused on exploring and analysing the data collected in the WGEEL database for their potential use in stock assessment. This included identifying gaps in the available data, defining data requirements for specific analyses in future and developing procedures for the analysis of these data. Furthermore, the group reviewed the effects of contamination on the reproductive potential of eels and renewed their recommendation to consider these in the assessment of effective spawning-stock biomass.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCopenhagen, Denmark
PublisherInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)
Number of pages205
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
SeriesICES Scientific Report
Number85
Volume3
ISSN2618-1371

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working Group on Eels (WGEEL)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this