TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigation of the structural performance and failure mechanisms of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber-based composites
AU - Komal, Ujendra Kumar
AU - Siddiqui, Amir Hamza
AU - Tewari, Asim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Society of Plastics Engineers.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Additive manufacturing of continuous fiber-based polymeric composites has attracted global attention. This contemporary technology enables the flexibility of manufacturing customized, partially and fully functional, and advanced composite components for numerous semi-structural and structural applications. The current study investigates the structural performance of 3D-printed carbon fiber-based composites in the context of tensile, flexural, and high-cycle fatigue. The crucial S-N curves for the unidirectional (UD) (0°) and cross-ply (CP) (0, 90) composites have been plotted. The dominating failure mechanisms responsible for the failure of 3D printed composites under tensile, flexural, and high cycle fatigue loading at the micro-scale have been thoroughly investigated. The influence of fiber orientation on the failure mechanisms under different structural loading has been rigorously studied. The current findings conclude that cross-ply (0, 90) composites exhibited superior fatigue performance than the unidirectional composites when investigated at 70% of their ultimate tensile strength. The current investigation reveals that the formation of voids during 3D printing and majorly during loading is one of the leading causes of the failure of additively manufactured composites under mechanical and cyclic loads. The fiber pull-out, fiber breakage, de-bonding, and voids are the dominating failure mechanisms observed under tensile loading. In addition to the failure mechanisms listed under tensile loading, matrix fractures have also been observed under flexural loading. The dominating failure mechanisms differed for UD, CP (0, 90), and CP (45, −45) composites. Highlights: Investigated tensile, flexural, and fatigue properties of continuous fiber 3D-printed composites. Examined failure mechanisms under tensile, bending, and fatigue loading. Developed test coupons with built-in tabs for tensile and fatigue testing. Cross-ply composites showed better fatigue performance than unidirectional.
AB - Additive manufacturing of continuous fiber-based polymeric composites has attracted global attention. This contemporary technology enables the flexibility of manufacturing customized, partially and fully functional, and advanced composite components for numerous semi-structural and structural applications. The current study investigates the structural performance of 3D-printed carbon fiber-based composites in the context of tensile, flexural, and high-cycle fatigue. The crucial S-N curves for the unidirectional (UD) (0°) and cross-ply (CP) (0, 90) composites have been plotted. The dominating failure mechanisms responsible for the failure of 3D printed composites under tensile, flexural, and high cycle fatigue loading at the micro-scale have been thoroughly investigated. The influence of fiber orientation on the failure mechanisms under different structural loading has been rigorously studied. The current findings conclude that cross-ply (0, 90) composites exhibited superior fatigue performance than the unidirectional composites when investigated at 70% of their ultimate tensile strength. The current investigation reveals that the formation of voids during 3D printing and majorly during loading is one of the leading causes of the failure of additively manufactured composites under mechanical and cyclic loads. The fiber pull-out, fiber breakage, de-bonding, and voids are the dominating failure mechanisms observed under tensile loading. In addition to the failure mechanisms listed under tensile loading, matrix fractures have also been observed under flexural loading. The dominating failure mechanisms differed for UD, CP (0, 90), and CP (45, −45) composites. Highlights: Investigated tensile, flexural, and fatigue properties of continuous fiber 3D-printed composites. Examined failure mechanisms under tensile, bending, and fatigue loading. Developed test coupons with built-in tabs for tensile and fatigue testing. Cross-ply composites showed better fatigue performance than unidirectional.
KW - 3D printing
KW - Composites
KW - Failure mechanisms
KW - Fused deposition modeling
KW - Mechanical properties
U2 - 10.1002/pc.29512
DO - 10.1002/pc.29512
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85215289352
SN - 0272-8397
JO - Polymer Composites
JF - Polymer Composites
ER -