Abstract
A selective study of literature within safety culture, corporate
culture and organisational theory have shown that the safety
culture approach can benefit from the corporate culture approaches
and organisational theory dealing with political processes. The
implicit models of organisation within mainstream safety culture
approaches is over rationalististic compared with day to day life
of organisations. A simplistic model of mans behaviour, and too
abbreviated understanding of the total set of goals and means in
action in organisation and rather simple change management models
flaws the safety culture approaches.The Concept of a multicultural
organisation thus aims at encompassing the multitude of actor
positions within an organisation with possible influence on the
prevention work. A case study within industry is used to
demonstrate the benefits of mobilizing these additional
approaches. It is shown how different sets of meaning assigned to
accidents -cultures- is in conflict and that the accident analysis
process leads to the domination of one of them; the "faulty human
behaviour" perception. Hence an intervention method for prevention
of accidents must built on first an understanding of an
organisation as a Multi-cultural Organisation. Second on change
processes as political processes where the needed change have to
be negotiated and reshaped.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Safety Science |
ISSN | 0925-7535 |
Publication status | Published - 1999 |