Interplanetary magnetic field Bx component influence on horizontal and field‐aligned currents in the ionosphere

K. M. Laundal*, J. P. Reistad, C. C. Finlay, N. Østgaaard, P. Tenjord, K. Snekvik, A. Ohma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

201 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Statistical analyses have shown that the sunward component of the interplanetary magnetic field, Bx (GSM), moderately but significantly affects the auroral intensity. These observations have been interpreted as signatures of a similar IMF Bx control on Birkeland currents, yet to be observed directly. Such a control, attributed to differences in magnetic tension on newly opened magnetic field lines, would lead to stronger region 1 (R1) Birkeland currents for Bx negative (positive) conditions in the northern (southern) hemisphere than when Bx is positive (negative). In this paper we perform a detailed investigation of three different sets of magnetic field measurements, from the CHAMP and Swarm low‐Earth‐Orbit satellites, from the AMPERE products derived from the Iridium satellite constellation, and from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network, each analyzed using different techniques, to test these predictions. The results show that a change in sign of Bx changes the Birkeland currents by no more than ≈10%. The current patterns show little support for an inter‐hemispheric asymmetry of the kind proposed to explain auroral observations. Instead we propose an alternative interpretation, which is consistent with most of the auroral observations and with the current observations in the present paper, except for those based on AMPERE: The solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling is more efficient when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign than when they are different. We suggest the higher coupling is because the dayside reconnection region is closer to the subsolar point when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
ISSN2169-9380
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

@article{11ca20ff9a34498086c7a642f2172f4f,
title = "Interplanetary magnetic field Bx component influence on horizontal and field‐aligned currents in the ionosphere",
abstract = "Statistical analyses have shown that the sunward component of the interplanetary magnetic field, Bx (GSM), moderately but significantly affects the auroral intensity. These observations have been interpreted as signatures of a similar IMF Bx control on Birkeland currents, yet to be observed directly. Such a control, attributed to differences in magnetic tension on newly opened magnetic field lines, would lead to stronger region 1 (R1) Birkeland currents for Bx negative (positive) conditions in the northern (southern) hemisphere than when Bx is positive (negative). In this paper we perform a detailed investigation of three different sets of magnetic field measurements, from the CHAMP and Swarm low‐Earth‐Orbit satellites, from the AMPERE products derived from the Iridium satellite constellation, and from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network, each analyzed using different techniques, to test these predictions. The results show that a change in sign of Bx changes the Birkeland currents by no more than ≈10{\%}. The current patterns show little support for an inter‐hemispheric asymmetry of the kind proposed to explain auroral observations. Instead we propose an alternative interpretation, which is consistent with most of the auroral observations and with the current observations in the present paper, except for those based on AMPERE: The solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling is more efficient when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign than when they are different. We suggest the higher coupling is because the dayside reconnection region is closer to the subsolar point when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign.",
author = "Laundal, {K. M.} and Reistad, {J. P.} and Finlay, {C. C.} and N. {\O}stgaaard and P. Tenjord and K. Snekvik and A. Ohma",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1002/2017JA024864",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",

}

Interplanetary magnetic field Bx component influence on horizontal and field‐aligned currents in the ionosphere. / Laundal, K. M.; Reistad, J. P.; Finlay, C. C.; Østgaaard, N.; Tenjord, P.; Snekvik, K.; Ohma, A.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interplanetary magnetic field Bx component influence on horizontal and field‐aligned currents in the ionosphere

AU - Laundal, K. M.

AU - Reistad, J. P.

AU - Finlay, C. C.

AU - Østgaaard, N.

AU - Tenjord, P.

AU - Snekvik, K.

AU - Ohma, A.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Statistical analyses have shown that the sunward component of the interplanetary magnetic field, Bx (GSM), moderately but significantly affects the auroral intensity. These observations have been interpreted as signatures of a similar IMF Bx control on Birkeland currents, yet to be observed directly. Such a control, attributed to differences in magnetic tension on newly opened magnetic field lines, would lead to stronger region 1 (R1) Birkeland currents for Bx negative (positive) conditions in the northern (southern) hemisphere than when Bx is positive (negative). In this paper we perform a detailed investigation of three different sets of magnetic field measurements, from the CHAMP and Swarm low‐Earth‐Orbit satellites, from the AMPERE products derived from the Iridium satellite constellation, and from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network, each analyzed using different techniques, to test these predictions. The results show that a change in sign of Bx changes the Birkeland currents by no more than ≈10%. The current patterns show little support for an inter‐hemispheric asymmetry of the kind proposed to explain auroral observations. Instead we propose an alternative interpretation, which is consistent with most of the auroral observations and with the current observations in the present paper, except for those based on AMPERE: The solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling is more efficient when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign than when they are different. We suggest the higher coupling is because the dayside reconnection region is closer to the subsolar point when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign.

AB - Statistical analyses have shown that the sunward component of the interplanetary magnetic field, Bx (GSM), moderately but significantly affects the auroral intensity. These observations have been interpreted as signatures of a similar IMF Bx control on Birkeland currents, yet to be observed directly. Such a control, attributed to differences in magnetic tension on newly opened magnetic field lines, would lead to stronger region 1 (R1) Birkeland currents for Bx negative (positive) conditions in the northern (southern) hemisphere than when Bx is positive (negative). In this paper we perform a detailed investigation of three different sets of magnetic field measurements, from the CHAMP and Swarm low‐Earth‐Orbit satellites, from the AMPERE products derived from the Iridium satellite constellation, and from the SuperMAG ground magnetometer network, each analyzed using different techniques, to test these predictions. The results show that a change in sign of Bx changes the Birkeland currents by no more than ≈10%. The current patterns show little support for an inter‐hemispheric asymmetry of the kind proposed to explain auroral observations. Instead we propose an alternative interpretation, which is consistent with most of the auroral observations and with the current observations in the present paper, except for those based on AMPERE: The solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling is more efficient when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign than when they are different. We suggest the higher coupling is because the dayside reconnection region is closer to the subsolar point when the dipole tilt angle and Bx have the same sign.

U2 - 10.1002/2017JA024864

DO - 10.1002/2017JA024864

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

ER -