International experiences with opposition to wind energy siting decisions: Lessons for environmental and social appraisal

Matthew Cashmore, David Philipp Rudolph*, Helle Nielsen, Sanne Vammen Larsen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The planning of renewable energy infrastructure has proven highly controversial across many countries. We critically examine the lessons that can be learned from research investigating the causes of controversy over wind turbines. The review focuses on a specific, but often highly controversial, component of planning practice: environmental and social appraisal. The review advances understandings of the reasons for contestation over the social impacts of wind turbines; the basis and legitimacy of plurality and contestation; and, the biases that tend to underpin understandings of the role and functioning of participation in appraisal. A typology of actors' attitudes to wind energy is employed to elucidate the implications of our review for appraisal practices. We conclude that a broader understanding of the societal purposes of public participation needs to be integrated into appraisal theory and practice, including an acceptance of the legitimacy of antagonism and dissent and its value in fostering social learning.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
    Volume62
    Issue number7
    Pages (from-to)1109-1132
    Number of pages24
    ISSN0964-0568
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Keywords

    • Appraisal
    • Renewable energy
    • Wind turbines
    • Planning conflict

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'International experiences with opposition to wind energy siting decisions: Lessons for environmental and social appraisal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this