Interhemispheric Comparisons of Large Nighttime Magnetic Perturbation Events Relevant to GICs

Mark J. Engebretson, Kathryn R. Kirkevold, Erik S. Steinmetz, Viacheslav A. Pilipenko, Mark B. Moldwin, Brett A. McCuen, C. R. Clauer, Michael D. Hartinger, Shane Coyle, Hermann Opgenoorth, Hermann Opgenoorth, Anna N. Willer, Thom R. Edwards, David H. Boteler, Andy J. Gerrard, Mervyn P. Freeman, Michael C. Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Nearly all studies of impulsive magnetic perturbation events (MPEs) with large magnetic field variability (dB/dt) that can produce dangerous geomagnetically‐induced currents (GICs) have used data from the northern hemisphere. Here we present details of four large‐amplitude MPE events (|ΔBx|> 900 nT and|dB/dt|> 10 nT/s in at least one component) observed between 2015 and 2018 in conjugate high latitude regions (65‐80° corrected geomagnetic latitude), using magnetometer data from (1) Pangnirtung and Iqaluit in eastern Arctic Canada and the magnetically conjugate South Pole Station in Antarctica and (2) the Greenland West Coast Chain and two magnetically conjugate chains in Antarctica, AAL‐PIP and BAS LPM. From 1 to 3 different isolated MPEs localized in corrected geomagnetic latitude were observed during 3 pre‐midnight events; many were simultaneous within 3 min in both hemispheres. Their conjugate latitudinal amplitude profiles, however, matched qualitatively at best. During an extended post‐midnight interval, which we associate with an interval of omega bands, multiple highly localized MPEs occurred independently in time at each station in both hemispheres. These nighttime MPEs occurred under a wide range of geomagnetic conditions, but common to each was a negative IMF Bz that exhibited at least a modest increase at or near the time of the event. A comparison of perturbation amplitudes to modeled ionospheric conductances in conjugate hemispheres clearly favored a current generator model over a voltage generator model for 3 of the 4 events; neither model provided a good fit for the pre‐midnight event that occurred near vernal equinox.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2020JA028128
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume125
Issue number8
ISSN2169-897X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Geomagnetically-induced currents
  • Magnetic perturbation events
  • Substorms
  • Magnetic storms
  • Magnetic conjugacy
  • Omega bands

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interhemispheric Comparisons of Large Nighttime Magnetic Perturbation Events Relevant to GICs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this