Interfractional Dose Accumulation for MR-guided Liver SBRT: Variation Among Algorithms is Highly Patient- and Fraction-dependent

Isak Wahlstedt*, Abraham George Smith, Claus Erik Andersen, Claus Preibisch Behrens, Susanne Nørring Bekke, Kristian Boye, Mette van Overeem Felter, Mirjana Josipovic, Jens Petersen, Signe Lenora Risumlund, José David Tascón-Vidarte, Janita Eizabeth van Timmeren, Ivan Richter Vogelius

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and purpose: Daily plan adaptations could take the dose delivered in previous fractions into account. Due to high dose delivered per fraction, low number of fractions, steep dose gradients, and large interfractional organ deformations, this might be particularly important for liver SBRT. This study investigates inter-algorithm variation of interfractional dose accumulation for MR-guided liver SBRT.
Materials and methods: We assessed 27 consecutive MR-guided liver SBRT treatments of 67.5 Gy in three (n = 15) or 50 Gy in five fractions (n = 12), both prescribed to the GTV. We calculated fraction doses on daily patient anatomy, warped these doses to the simulation MRI using seven different algorithms, and accumulated the warped doses. Thus, we obtained differences in planned doses and warped or accumulated doses for each algorithm. This enabled us to calculate the inter-algorithm variations in warped doses per fraction and in accumulated doses per treatment course.
Results: The four intensity-based algorithms were more consistent with planned PTV dose than affine or contour-based algorithms. The mean (range) variation of the dose difference for PTV D95% due to dose warping by these intensity-based algorithms was 10.4 percentage points (0.3 to 43.7) between fractions and 8.6 (0.3 to 24.9) between accumulated treatment doses. As seen by these ranges, the variation was very dependent on the patient and the fraction being analyzed. Nevertheless, no correlations between patient or plan characteristics on the one hand and inter-algorithm dose warping variation on the other hand was found.
Conclusion: Inter-algorithm dose accumulation variation is highly patient- and fraction-dependent for MR-guided liver SBRT. We advise against trusting a single algorithm for dose accumulation in liver SBRT.
Original languageEnglish
Article number109448
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume182
Number of pages9
ISSN0167-8140
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Radiotherapy
  • MR-guided radiotherapy
  • Liver metastases
  • Dose accumulation
  • Deformable image registration
  • SABR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interfractional Dose Accumulation for MR-guided Liver SBRT: Variation Among Algorithms is Highly Patient- and Fraction-dependent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this