Inter-laboratory comparison of medical computed tomography (CT) scanners for industrial applications in the slaughterhouses

Lars Bager Christensen, Jais Andreas Breusch Angel

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Using computed tomography (CT) in the calibration of online grading equipment has been demonstrated to be beneficial over the last years by several institutions using medical CT scanners. The difference in makes and models calls for a standardized (and calibrated) method to be able to quantify differences in CT performance. The presented Round Robin scheme has demonstrated its potential as such a method.
    The benefit of the phantom set is that it provides a convenient way of comparing volume determination between different CT scanners. The suggested phantoms are mimicking important carcass features, conventionally recognized to be challenging to medical CT scanners.
    The web based classification software PigClassWeb has been demonstrated to be a convenient way of handling and comparing CT data in a transparent way, across regions and over time.
    The phantom set may be used to compare regional differences in analyzing software.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationFarm Animal Imaging Kaposvár 2013
    EditorsC. Maltin, C. Craigie, L. Bunger
    PublisherQuality Meat Scotland
    Publication date2013
    Pages27-32
    ISBN (Print)978-0-9570709-9-8
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    Event1st Farm Animal Imaging (FAIM) Conference - Kaposvár, Hungary
    Duration: 29 Oct 201330 Oct 2013
    Conference number: 1

    Conference

    Conference1st Farm Animal Imaging (FAIM) Conference
    Number1
    Country/TerritoryHungary
    CityKaposvár
    Period29/10/201330/10/2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-laboratory comparison of medical computed tomography (CT) scanners for industrial applications in the slaughterhouses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this